Exducer
0 failure reports named the exducer in the last ten years, 1 since 1996. 3 FAA approvals let 2 companies make a replacement exducer, Zee Company INC holding the most (2).
Reports by year
Reports by year, as a table
| reports | |
|---|---|
| 1996 | 1 |
Approved replacement parts 3 parts manufacturer approvals
A parts manufacturer approval (PMA) lets a company other than the aircraft's maker make a exducer and sell it as an approved part for the models named. These are the companies holding such approvals for a exducer:
For these models most: Fairchild SA227 (1), Fairchild SA226 (1), Douglas DC-8 (1), Boeing 737 (1), Boeing 727 (1), Boeing 707 (1).
| Maker | Part | Replaces | Fits | Granted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wencor LLC | Exducer 354685-5WE | 354685-5 | Boeing 707-100 Long Body, 707-100B... | 2010-02-02 | current |
| Zee Company INC | Exducer Z202094-1 | Fairchild Aircraft SA226-T, -T(B), -AT | 1996-11-28 | current | |
| Zee Company INC | Exducer Z202094-,1 | Wheel assembly 1457D160 | British Aerospace 3100 and 3101, 3100 and 3101 | 1996-11-28 | current |
Sources: the FAA's service difficulty reports since 1995 (a report is a part that failed and was fixed, as filed by an airline, repair station or owner; the count shows reporting as much as reliability) and the parts manufacturer approvals in the FAA's Dynamic Regulatory System. The part name is the reporters' and the approval holders' own words, reduced to the first plain words so that spellings meet.