The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR23FA323 · Final report

Amateur-built CASSUTT accident near West Jordan, Utah, August 23, 2023

On August 23, 2023 at about 6:00 pm local time, a 2001 amateur-built CASSUTT, registered N6291N, was substantially damaged in an accident during initial climb near West Jordan, Utah (South Valley Rgnl airport). It was a flight test under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

A loss of control during the initial climb for reasons that could not be determined.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
August 23, 2023 · about 6:00 pm local time
Place
West Jordan, Utah · South Valley Rgnl · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was killed.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Amateur-built CASSUTT, built 2001
Registration
N6291N · registry record · serial 1
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Flight test · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot was performing test flights in the accident airplane after he assembled and installed the engine. The pilot (racer) who was scheduled to fly the airplane in an upcoming air race stated that, during the flight before the accident flight, the accident pilot had noticed high engine oil temperature. The racer also stated that the engine oil pressure was low before the accident pilot departed on the accident flight. The racer witnessed that accident, and stated that, after the airplane lifted off about 1/3 down the runway, it entered a climb and then made an abrupt right turn, entered a nose-down attitude, and rapidly descended to the ground. Surveillance video showed the airplane impact the fence and the ground in a slight nose- and left-wing-low attitude. There was no flight track data associated with the accident flight or nonvolatile memory recovered from the airplane. Postaccident examination of the airframe revealed multiple separations in the flight control system; however, there was no evidence of a preimpact mechanical anomaly or malfunction that would have precluded normal operation. The engine examination showed circumferential recessed grooves on multiple crankshaft main journals, longitudinal scoring marks on each of the piston skirts, and severe wear on several of the bearing shell inner surfaces. This engine wear was likely to have caused a malfunction such as a loss of power or engine seizure; however, whether or to what extent an engine performance deficiency contributed to the accident could not be determined. The pilot had reconfigured the airplane from a conventional to a T-tail design. Subsequent flight testing by the pilot’s friend showed that the airplane could enter a “deadband” during turns, in which the elevator would become ineffective. Elevator effectiveness could only be resolved by accelerating. No maintenance or flight records were obtained for the accident airplane, and the pilot’s total and recent experience in the airplane, either before or after the empennage reconfiguration, could not be determined. While the witness’ descriptions of the accident indicate that the airplane may have entered an accelerated stall during the turn, it is also possible that the pilot lost elevator authority while maneuvering at a low altitude and he was unable to recover. Due to the lack of data associated with the accident flight, the circumstances of the loss of control could not be determined. The pilot’s autopsy report identified 75% narrowing of the left anterior descending coronary artery by plaque and no other evidence of significant natural disease; however, there was no forensic evidence that the pilot had a cardiac event in flight, thus it is unlikely that the pilot’s coronary artery disease contributed to the accident.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during approach (VFR pattern crosswind)
  2. Loss of control in flight during initial climb defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Airspeed › Not attained/maintained
  • Aircraft › Aircraft structures › Empennage structure › Elevators › Design
  • Not determined › Not determined › (general) › (general) › Unknown/Not determined

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Medical certificate: BasicMed (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: sngl
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Seats: 1
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Cont Motor O-200 SERIES (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Runway 16, 5,862 ft by 100 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 150° at 10 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: scat at 8,500 ft
  • Temperature: 77°F (25°C), dew point 54°F (12°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.21 inHg
  • Observation at 11:55 am from KU42, 1 miles away

Weather report (METAR): KU42 231755Z AUTO 15010KT 10SM SCT085 SCT120 25/12 A3021 RMK AO1 T02520119 10259 20156

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

12 documents, released by the NTSB on February 20, 2025. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.