The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR20FA051 · Final report

Cirrus SF50 accident near Santa Monica, California, December 27, 2019

On December 27, 2019 at about 7:55 pm local time, a 2017 Cirrus SF50, registered N52CV, was substantially damaged in an accident during standing (engine(s) start-up) near Santa Monica, California (Santa Monica Muni airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The improper design of the audio interface system, which caused an electrical short circuit that led to a ground fire.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
December 27, 2019 · about 7:55 pm local time
Place
Santa Monica, California · Santa Monica Muni · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cirrus SF50 No Series, built 2017 · all SF50s on the register
Registration
N52CV · no longer on the register · serial 0010
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

After starting the airplane’s engine for a planned flight, the pilot began to smell smoke, which became stronger as he continued with flight preparations. The pilot decided to terminate flight preparations and have a mechanic examine the airplane. After shutting down the engine, the pilot saw smoke rising from the armrest area of the right center passenger seat. By the time the mechanic arrived, the smoke had become dense, and the airplane cabin became engulfed in flames a few minutes later. Postaccident examinations revealed that the source of the fire was likely an audio interface card, which was part of a system that enabled occupants to connect their non-aviation headsets to the airplane’s intercom and entertainment system. The card was installed in the side panel of the airplane in the armrest area where smoke was first observed. Evaluation of the card revealed that its design allowed an excessive flow of current to pass through a current-limiting resistor in its power-protection circuit when its input filter capacitors or reference diode failed in a short-circuit condition. Under this scenario, the flow of current resulted in the resistor having to dissipate more power than it was rated for, resulting in a buildup of heat. The design called for the use of either a wire-wound or thick-film current-limiting resistor. Testing revealed that, under the short-circuit condition, designs with both types of resistors would result in heat sufficient to create thermal damage. The thick-film design would typically fail in an open circuit a short time later and return to a normal temperature; however, the wire-wound resistor would continue to produce heat and eventually an open flame. Compounding the electrical design flaw was the physical installation of the cards, which were encased in a heat-shrink sleeve and then wrapped with nylon cable ties to standoffs on the inside of the panel walls. The use of a heat-shrink sleeve to cover the boards meant that most of the components were in direct contact with the sleeve when shrunk. The contact was even more pronounced against the input filter capacitors because they were mounted near the board’s edge. Additionally, because the units were held to the airframe with nylon cable ties that wrapped around the boards, the components were subject to external forces, from contact with the ties, during installation and throughout their lifetime. The manufacturer of the input filter capacitors specifically stated that stress after installation could result in a crack that might cause a short circuit. Because four input filter capacitors were used, all of which were installed in parallel, the chance of failure and short circuit increased by a factor of four. The capacitor manufacturer further stated that, if the circuit being used caused an electrical shock, smoke, or fire when a capacitor is shorted, a fail-safe device, such as a fuse, would prevent secondary accidents. The audio cards were powered via a 5-ampere circuit breaker used by the airplane’s audio panel. Although this power rating was appropriate for the audio panel and all audio cards, the current drawn by an individual audio card short circuit was not sufficient to cause the circuit breaker to trip. The audio cards did not incorporate any internal or external secondary fuse. Postaccident flammability testing indicated that the cards would fail in an open circuit and self-extinguish after igniting except for one card, which was equipped with a wire-wound resistor and continued to produce an intermittent flame as long as power was supplied. As a result, the flame continued to burn and created hot flaming drips. The accident airplane was equipped with audio cards that used a wire-wound resistor. It is likely that, when the pilot engaged the airplanes electrical power via the master switch, one of the cards mounted in the right side panel failed in short-circuit, creating the flame that eventually consumed the airplane cabin. A Federal Aviation Administration airworthiness directive resulted in the removal of all audio interface cards from all equipped Cirrus airplanes. The manufacturer then redesigned the audio cards and increased the resistance and power rating for the current-limiting resistor such that, under a short-circuit condition, the resistor’s power rating could not be exceeded. The manufacturer also replaced the input filter capacitors with a more robust, single capacitor and encased the unit in a plastic box filled with potting compound.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Fire/smoke (non-impact) during standing (engine(s) start-up) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Equipment/furnishings › Passenger compartment equip › Design
  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Equipment/furnishings › Passenger compartment equip › Malfunction

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land; single-engine sea; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 436 hours in all; 150 in this make and model
  • Last flight review: May 23, 2019
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 847.6 hours
  • Last inspection: continuous airworthiness programme, September 6, 2019; 109 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 6,000 lb
  • Seats: 7
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Williams FJ33-5A (turbofan); 848 hours total
  • Fire on the ground

The flight

  • Departed from: SMO Santa Monica CA
  • Destination: CRQ Carlsbad CA
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 210° at 7 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 57°F (14°C), dew point 41°F (5°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.94 inHg
  • Observation at 7:51 pm from SMO, 1 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

13 documents, released by the NTSB on November 17, 2022. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.