The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA22LA249 · Final report

Aeronca 7AC accident near Melrose, Tennessee, May 29, 2022

On May 29, 2022 at about 9:00 pm local time, a 1946 Aeronca 7AC, registered N1294E, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (cruise) near Melrose, Tennessee. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

A total loss of engine power due to carburetor icing.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
May 29, 2022 · about 9:00 pm local time
Place
Melrose, Tennessee · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people had minor injuries.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Aeronca 7AC, built 1946 · all 7ACs on the register
Registration
N1294E · registry record · serial 7AC-4855
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot reported that he departed from the private grass airstrip on his farm and had been flying for about 25 minutes. He climbed to 2,500 ft mean sea level (msl) before descending to 1,500 ft msl and turning to the northeast. The airplane’s engine then lost all power and the pilot turned northwest toward “river bottoms” that were about 1 mile away to attempt a forced landing. When it was obvious that the airplane could not reach the river bottoms, he maneuvered to an area that did not have any large trees. During the forced landing, the airplane’s right wing struck a tree and the airplane then spun 180° before coming to rest, which resulted in substantial damage to the right wing and rudder. In his written statement, the pilot did not indicate whether he had attempted to restart the engine or had applied carburetor heat after the engine lost all power. The on-site examination of the airplane found the carburetor heat in the OFF position. The pilot reported that he had departed with about 12 gallons of fuel on board. Although only about an inch of fuel was found remaining in the 13-gallon fuel tank the day after the accident, the examination revealed that the gascolator bowl was missing/broken, which likely would have allowed any remaining fuel to drain out. A fuel selector valve had been installed behind the firewall between the fuel tank and the fuel line that led to the gascolator. The installed fuel selector valve was not labeled with ON and OFF locations and the valve was able to be turned 360° with ease, with no apparent detents. The airframe examination also revealed that the original fuel shutoff valve handle located on the engine control panel had been disconnected. A postaccident examination of the engine revealed no evidence of any preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. It is possible that during the flight the modified fuel selector valve vibrated, or was inadvertently moved by the pilot, to a position that stopped or reduced the fuel flow to the gascolator. However, a weather reporting station located about 8 miles from the accident site indicated that the temperature was 84° F, and the dew point was 61°F. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin CE-09-35, Carburetor Icing Prevention, indicated that the weather conditions at the time were conducive to serious icing at glide power. Based on the reported conditions and accident scenario, the airplane likely encountered serious carburetor icing conditions during the 1,000 ft descent, which resulted in a total loss of engine power.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Off-field or emergency landing during enroute
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during enroute
  3. Fuel related during enroute (cruise) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Lack of action › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Temp/humidity/pressure › Conducive to carburetor icing › Decision related to condition

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instructor: instrument airplane
  • Flight time: 4,700 hours in all; 120 in this make and model; 14 in the last 90 days; 8 in the last 30 days
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rear
  • Injury: minor injuries

Passenger

  • Seat: frt
  • Injury: minor injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 2,655 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, November 2, 2021; 1.7 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,220 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Continental A-65-8 (piston); 47 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: PVT Maryville TN at 8:30 pm
  • Destination: TN20 Seymour TN
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 040° at 4 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: a few clouds at 7,500 ft
  • Temperature: 84°F (29°C), dew point 61°F (16°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.99 inHg
  • Observation at 4:53 pm from TYS, 8 miles away

Weather report (METAR): METAR KTYS 292053Z VRB04KT 10SM BKN075 29/16 A2999 RMK AO2 SLP145 T02890161 56011 $

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

6 documents, released by the NTSB on June 20, 2024. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.