The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN24FA160 · Final report

Piper Aircraft INC PA 46-350P accident near Hartsburg, Missouri, April 16, 2024

On April 16, 2024 at about 5:05 pm local time, a 2012 Piper Aircraft INC PA 46-350P, registered N451MA, was destroyed in an accident during enroute (cruise) near Hartsburg, Missouri. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s encounter with convective weather conditions, which resulted in a loss of airplane control, the exceedance of the airplane’s never exceed speed, and the resulting overload failure of the horizontal stabilizer and subsequent failure of the airplane’s wings.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
April 16, 2024 · about 5:05 pm local time
Place
Hartsburg, Missouri · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was killed.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Piper Aircraft INC PA 46-350P, built 2012
Registration
N451MA · registry record · serial 4636541
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The airplane was on an instrument flight rules flight and air traffic control (ATC) provided the pilot with vector guidance to avoid an active military operations area (MOA). The controller informed the pilot that he would only be able to deviate to the left of his course due to the active MOA. At that time, the airplane was in an area of developing convective weather activity and likely in instrument meteorological conditions. The pilot reported to ATC that he encountered freezing rain. ATC communications revealed that the pilot requested to deviate to the left of his course due to weather, including mention of encountering freezing rain, which ATC approved. Flight track data showed the airplane entered a descending left turn. A performance study based on the aircraft track data showed that, during the turn, the airplane’s roll angle reached 70°, the pitch angle reached -17° and then -34°, and the calibrated airspeed exceeded both the airplane's published never exceed speed (VNE), and its maximum operating maneuvering speed (VO). During the turn, the airplane’s structure broke apart, and wreckage was distributed along a 3-mile path. The flight path depicted in the flight track data was consistent with a loss of airplane control. Postaccident examination of the airplane confirmed that the horizontal stabilizer and the wings failed in a downward direction. A failure of the airplane’s horizontal stabilizer would result in the airplane pitching forward and a high negative load to the wings. The examination noted that all identified failures in the airplane structure had signatures consistent with overload failure. Examination of the airplane’s flight control system did not reveal any preexisting anomalies. The cockpit avionics could not be tested due to impact damage. Based on the available data, the pilot encountered forecast adverse weather associated with convective activity. The pilot noted to ATC that he encountered freezing rain, however, the quantity of ice accumulation and its effect on the flight could not be determined. While attempting to deviate from his flight path to avoid this weather, airplane control was lost and it entered a steep descending turn. During the turn, the airplane’s speed exceeded its published never exceed speed, which resulted in overload failure of the horizontal stabilizer and subsequent failure of the airplane’s wings.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Aircraft structural failure during uncontrolled descent
  2. Windshear or thunderstorm during enroute (cruise)
  3. Loss of control in flight during enroute (cruise) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Airspeed › Capability exceeded
  • Aircraft › Aircraft structures › Empennage structure › Horizontal stabilizer › Capability exceeded
  • Aircraft › Aircraft structures › Wing structure › (general) › Capability exceeded
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › (general) › Not attained/maintained
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Convective weather › (general) › Decision related to condition

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot, private
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 1,458.3 hours in all; 78.2 in this make and model; 74.9 in the last 90 days; 26.0 in the last 30 days
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 1,370 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, June 19, 2023
  • Seats: 6
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Lycoming TIO-540-AE2A (piston); 1,477 hours total
  • Operator: Upward Aviation LLC

The flight

  • Departed from: MSN Madison WI at 2:51 pm
  • Destination: SLG Siloam Springs AR
  • Flight plan: IFR

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 170° at 16 knots, gusting 27
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 3,700 ft
  • Temperature: 73°F (23°C), dew point 64°F (18°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.67 inHg
  • Observation at 11:54 am from KCOU, 7 miles away

Weather report (METAR): KCOU 161654Z 17016G27KT 10SM OVC037 23/18 A2967 RMK AO2 PK WND 17033/1603 RAB12E43 SLP038 P0000 T02280178

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

16 documents, released by the NTSB on April 15, 2026. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

#DocumentWhat it is
1 ATC Communication Summary PDF, 9 pages · our copy View Download
2 Partial Transcript of Communications PDF, 2 pages · our copy View Download
3 Airplane Performance Plots for CEN24FA160 (Memorandum) PDF, 15 pages · our copy View Download
4 Flightaware Multilateration Data map file Download
5 ADS-B Data data file · our copy Download
6 Record of Conversation with Airplane Co-owner PDF, 1 page · our copy View Download
7 Record of Conversation with Flight Instructor PDF, 1 page · our copy View Download
8 Meteorology Specialist's Factual Report PDF, 22 pages · our copy View Download
9 Aircraft Examination Summary PDF, 8 pages · our copy View Download
10 Structures Group Chair Factual Report PDF, 20 pages · our copy View Download
11 Maintenance Record Excerpts PDF, 5 pages · our copy View Download
12 Excerpt from Pilota��s Operating Handbook and FAA Approved Flight Manual PDF, 1 page · our copy View Download
13 Recorders Lab Report PDF, 1 page · our copy View Download
14 Toxicological Report PDF, 1 page · our copy View Download
15 Statement of Party Representatives to NTSB Investigation PDF, 1 page · our copy View Download
16 Release of Aircraft Wreckage, NTSB Form 6120.15 PDF, 1 page · our copy View Download

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.