Quad City CHALLENGER accident near Kent, Washington, January 7, 2023
On January 7, 2023 at about 9:18 pm local time, a 2017 Quad City CHALLENGER, registered N528J, was substantially damaged in an accident during initial climb near Kent, Washington. It was a positioning flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were seriously injured. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The pilot’s inflight loss of airplane control. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s decision to fly the airplane without receiving training in its operation and flight characteristics.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- January 7, 2023 · about 9:18 pm local time
- Place
- Kent, Washington · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 2 people were seriously injured.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Quad City CHALLENGER II, built 2017
- Registration
- N528J · no longer on the register · serial CH2-1206-LSS-0110
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Positioning flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The pilot-rated passenger had just purchased the light sport airplane and hired the pilot to relocate airplane to his home airport. The passenger/owner reported that the pilot stated he had no experience in the airplane make and model, but that he ferried airplanes for a living and was confident with no hesitations. After conducting a preflight inspection, the pilot and passenger boarded the airplane and the passenger briefed the pilot on the use of the airplane’s flaperons. The passenger reported that the airplane “swerved right” about 20 ft above ground level after takeoff, and that the pilot continued the climb while adjusting the flaperons. The pilot reported that, shortly after takeoff, the airplane became “unresponsive” to left stick inputs and entered an uncontrolled turn to the right. The pilot was unable to recover, and the airplane descended and impacted the roof of a storage facility, resulting in substantial damage to the fuselage and both wings. The forward control stick aileron cables separated at the left aileron turnbuckle and right aileron cable near the forward pulley. The forward control stick aileron cable sections, including turnbuckles and forward pulleys, were removed for further examination. The flaperons were near the full-down position. Postaccident examination of the engine revealed no evidence of any preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. The right aileron control cable and the turnbuckle barrel for the left aileron control cable both exhibited ductile overstress fractures from abnormal loading, likely associated with impact. Even if either of the fractures occurred before impact, the ailerons could have been controlled by cables attached to the aft control stick. The left pulley and support brackets showed multiple contact marks and scratches consistent with cable contact outside the normal pulley groove contact area, but no similar contact marks were observed on the right pulley. If the abnormal cable marks on the left pulley were the result of slack in the system before the fracture, similar marks would also be expected on the right pulley. The absence of abnormal cable contact marks on the right pulley suggests the marks on the left pulley assembly likely occurred due to impact rather than due to preexisting slack in the system. Information from the airplane manufacturer stated that pilots should not attempt to fly without a proper type checkout. Information on the use of the flaperon system indicated that, under certain flight conditions with the flaperons extended, control stick pressures would become “heavy,” and in some cases, “an increasingly steep dive will result.” The pilot reported no experience in the accident airplane make and model. It is likely that the pilot’s lack of familiarity with the airplane’s flight characteristics resulted in his loss of airplane control during flight.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Loss of control in flight during initial climb defining event
- Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent
The NTSB's findings
- Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Lateral/bank control › Not attained/maintained
- Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Configuration › Incorrect use/operation
- Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Directional control › Not attained/maintained
- Personnel issues › Experience/knowledge › Experience/qualifications › Total experience w/ equipment › Pilot
- Personnel issues › Experience/knowledge › Knowledge › Knowledge of equipment › Pilot
- Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
Pilot
- Certificate: commercial pilot
- Ratings: single-engine land; single-engine sea; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 650 hours in all; 0 in this make and model; 85 in the last 90 days; 5 in the last 30 days; 579 as pilot in command; 0 on instruments
- Last flight review: August 5, 2022
- Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
- Seat: frt
- Injury: serious injuries
Pilot
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: single-engine land
- Flight time: 206 hours in all
- Last flight review: November 24, 2010
- Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
- Seat: rear
- Injury: serious injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 60 hours
- Last inspection: annual inspection, July 7, 2022
- Maximum gross weight: 960 lb
- Seats: 2
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Rotax 503 (piston); 60 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: S50 Auburn WA at 9:10 pm
- Destination: S43 Snohomish WA
- Flight plan: none
- A second pilot was aboard
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Visibility: 5 statute miles
- Sky: broken clouds at 4,800 ft
- Temperature: 46°F (8°C), dew point 45°F (7°C)
- Altimeter: 29.80 inHg
- Observation at 9:28 pm from KRNT, 8 miles away
Weather report (METAR): SPECI KRNT 072128Z 00000KT 5SM -RA BR BKN048 OVC060 08/07 A2980 RMK AO2 P0000 T00830072=
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 2 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
14 documents, released by the NTSB on January 29, 2025. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 - Owner | PDF, 11 pages | View Download |
| 2 | Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 - Pilot | PDF, 11 pages | View Download |
| 3 | NTSB Follow-up Q and A-conyers | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 4 | Airplane Owners Manual-flying | PDF, 5 pages | View Download |
| 5 | Aircraft Assembly Instructions-excerpt | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 6 | Record of Memorandum-quad City Aircraft | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 7 | ADS-B Data Images | PDF, 4 pages | View Download |
| 8 | NTSB Wreckage Examination Report | PDF, 11 pages | View Download |
| 9 | Faa-onsite Notes | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 10 | Security Video 1 | MOV file | Download |
| 11 | Security Video 2 | MOV file | Download |
| 12 | Materials Laboratory Factual Report 23-025 | PDF, 6 pages | View Download |
| 13 | Onboard Video-departure | MOV file | Download |
| 14 | Statement of Party Representatives to NTSB Investigation-qca | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
