Cessna 172 accident near Dunnellon, Florida, October 25, 2020
On October 25, 2020 at about 2:52 pm local time, a 1966 Cessna 172, registered N724BC, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute near Dunnellon, Florida. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
A total loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion. Contributing was the pilot’s exceedance of the airplane's critical angle of attack, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall/spin and loss of control.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- October 25, 2020 · about 2:52 pm local time
- Place
- Dunnellon, Florida · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 1 person was killed.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Cessna 172 H, built 1966 · all 172s on the register
- Registration
- N724BC · no longer on the register · serial 17255148
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
Radar data revealed that, about 20 minutes after departure, the airplane’s groundspeed decreased from 94 knots to 47 knots, and the airplane entered a descending left turn. Data from the airplane’s onboard engine analyzer revealed that this deceleration was preceded by a sudden and simultaneous drop in the airplane’s fuel flow rate and exhaust gas temperature (EGT) values, consistent with a loss of engine power. Following the accident, less than 1 gallon of fuel was recovered from the intact right wing fuel tank, and about 1 cup was recovered from the left wing (which was breached from impact). About 1 teaspoon of cloudy water was found in the airframe fuel filter bowl and the screen was partially blocked with debris. A review of the airplane’s fueling and flight records, including data from the onboard engine analyzer, revealed there would have been about 1 gallon of usable fuel onboard about the time of the loss of engine power. Examination of the engine revealed no other mechanical deficiencies that would have precluded normal operation at the time of the accident, and the total loss of engine power was likely the result of fuel exhaustion. Following the loss of engine power it is likely that the pilot exceeded the airplane’s critical angle of attack (as evidenced by the low recorded ground speed during the final moments of the flight), which resulted in an aerodynamic stall/spin and loss of control. Though Diazapam (Valium) and its metabolites were detected in the pilot’s system in post-accident toxicology testing, it could not be determined if the pilot’s use of diazepam contributed to the accident.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Loss of control in flight during enroute defining event
- Loss of engine power (total) during enroute
- Fuel exhaustion during enroute
- Fuel related during enroute
The NTSB's findings
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
- Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Fuel › Fluid level
Pilot
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 506.8 hours in all
- Last flight review: April 22, 2020
- Medical certificate: Class 3 (without waivers/limitations)
- Seat: left
- Injury: fatal
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 8,371.5 hours
- Last inspection: annual inspection, March 10, 2020
- Maximum gross weight: 2,300 lb
- Seats: 4
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Continental O-300D (piston); 5,214 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: 8FL3 Belleview FL at 2:34 pm
- Flight plan: none
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: at 4 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: clear
- Temperature: 79°F (26°C), dew point 73°F (23°C)
- Altimeter: 29.95 inHg
- Observation at 10:51 am from OCF, 10 miles away
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
12 documents, released by the NTSB on September 27, 2022. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NTSB Record of Conversation - Witness | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 2 | radar Plots | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 3 | radar .Csv File | data file | Download |
| 4 | Photos | PDF, 7 pages | View Download |
| 5 | Maintenance Records | PDF, 3 pages | View Download |
| 6 | Fuel Receipt | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 7 | Engine Data Monitor (Edm)- Specialist's Factual Report | PDF, 9 pages | View Download |
| 8 | Attachment 1 to Engine Data Monitor (EDM) - Specialist's Factual Report | data file | Download |
| 9 | Attachment 2 to Engine Data Monitor (EDM) - Specialist's Factual Report | data file | Download |
| 10 | NTSB - Autopsy Findings Memo | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 11 | Statement of Party Representatives to NTSB Investigation | PDF, 16 pages | View Download |
| 12 | Release of Aircraft Wreckage, NTSB Form 6120.15 and Evidence Control Forms | PDF, 3 pages | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Other NTSB records under N724BC the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
