Cessna 150M accident near Homerville, Georgia, May 9, 2017
On May 9, 2017 at about 7:25 pm local time, a 1976 Cessna 150M, registered N714DW, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (cruise) near Homerville, Georgia. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
A total loss of engine power due to inadequate maintenance and inspection of the engine, which resulted in a fatigue crack and subsequent failure of the No. 4 cylinder.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- May 9, 2017 · about 7:25 pm local time
- Place
- Homerville, Georgia · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Cessna 150M, built 1976 · all 150Ms on the register
- Registration
- N714DW · registry record · serial 15079105
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The pilot was conducting a cross-country flight when, during cruise at 3,000 ft mean sea level, he heard an unusual sound from the engine and engine power decreased to 1,500 rpm. The pilot unsuccessfully attempted to restore engine power, then light smoke began to enter the cockpit. The pilot subsequently declared an emergency with air traffic control and selected a forced landing site. During touchdown on a soft field, the airplane nosed over and came to rest inverted, resulting in substantial damage. Examination revealed that the engine's No. 4 cylinder had separated about halfway along the cylinder barrel from a fatigue crack that initiated at a cooling fin valley on the exterior surface. The fatigue crack grew around the circumference of the cylinder through approximately 30% of the cross section, and the remaining cross section succumbed to overstress. Once the cylinder fractured, the other components, such as the piston and connecting rod, sustained subsequent damage. Metallographic cross section of the cylinder at and near the fracture revealed the presence of corrosion pits under the remaining paint and primer. While the alloy used in the engine’s cylinders was not necessarily susceptive to pitting, other issues, such as crevice corrosion near an unpainted area or use in salt environments, can lead to similar corrosion features. Corrosion pits can be a common cause of fatigue cracking. Although the accident engine had accrued about 2,249 hours since its most recent major overhaul about 21 years before the accident which exceeded the engine manufacturer's overhaul recommendations of 2,000 operating hours or 12 years in service, whichever occurred first, the No. 4 cylinder had been installed new about 9 years before the accident. However, the presence of pitting corrosion to the extent that it resulted in failure of a cylinder is consistent with inadequate inspection and maintenance of the engine.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Loss of engine power (partial) during enroute (cruise)
- Loss of engine power (total) during enroute (cruise) defining event
- Loss of engine power (total) during emergency descent
- Off-field or emergency landing during landing
- Nose over/nose down during landing (landing roll)
The NTSB's findings
- Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine (reciprocating) › Recip eng cyl section › Not inspected
- Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine (reciprocating) › Recip eng cyl section › Fatigue/wear/corrosion
- Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine (reciprocating) › Recip eng cyl section › Failure
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Inspection › Scheduled/routine inspection › Maintenance personnel
Pilot
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 198 hours in all; 194 in this make and model; 142 in the last 90 days; 57 in the last 30 days; 167 as pilot in command
- Last flight review: April 25, 2017
- Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
- Seat: left
- Injury: no injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 7,309.6 hours
- Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, May 3, 2017; 32 hours since
- Maximum gross weight: 1,601 lb
- Seats: 2
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Cont Motor O-200-A48 (piston); 5,626 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: LCQ Lake City FL at 6:40 pm
- Destination: EZM Eastman GA
- Flight plan: none
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: clear
- Temperature: 90°F (32°C), dew point 52°F (11°C)
- Altimeter: 30.04 inHg
- Observation at 7:35 pm from KHOE
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
9 documents, released by the NTSB on April 28, 2021. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 | PDF, 9 pages | View Download |
| 2 | Witness Statements | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 3 | SIL98-9C | PDF, 4 pages | View Download |
| 4 | Excerpts from Maintenance Records | PDF, 5 pages | View Download |
| 5 | Photo Array | PDF, 13 pages | View Download |
| 6 | Memorandum for Record - Engine Examination | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 7 | Materials Laboratory Factual Report | PDF, 16 pages | View Download |
| 8 | Statement of Party Representatives to NTSB Investigation | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 9 | Evidence Control | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
