The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA14LA272 · Final report

Amateur-built VANS RV6 accident near Suffolk, Virginia, May 31, 2014

On May 31, 2014 at about 1:44 pm local time, a 2006 amateur-built VANS RV6, registered N6RP, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (cruise) near Suffolk, Virginia. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot/builder's decision to use a lubricant that was not designed for high-speed aviation applications, which resulted in the failure of the propeller needle thrust bearing due to the loss of lubrication from overheating, a total loss of aerodynamic thrust, and a subsequent forced landing.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
May 31, 2014 · about 1:44 pm local time
Place
Suffolk, Virginia · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person had minor injuries.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Amateur-built VANS RV6, built 2006
Registration
N6RP · registry record · serial 23075
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

According to the pilot, who was also the owner/builder of the experimental amateur-built airplane, while operating about 2,000 ft mean sea level, the engine rpm went to redline, the airplane lost thrust, and a red fluid covered the windscreen. The pilot attempted a forced landing to a field, but the airplane impacted trees, which resulted in substantial damage to the wings and fuselage. Postaccident examination of the engine revealed no mechanical malfunctions or anomalies to the engine or gearbox. Examination of the propeller showed that the fine pitch stop nuts were missing. The propeller needle thrust bearing and mating parts were galled, burned, and damaged from rotational and thermal wear. The heat damage likely initiated at the needle thrust bearing and progressed both fore and aft to the blade pin spool and slave piston collar, respectively. The Delrin bushing melted after the heat reached the blade pin spool, which allowed the propeller pins to make bare metal contact with the spool pin slots. With the absence of stop nuts, the propeller blade angle could decrease below a 0-thrust angle, and the melted Delrin bushings allowed the propeller blade angles to decrease an additional 6 degrees in the negative direction. The cumulative effect of both events was a total loss of aerodynamic thrust. About 28 flight hours before the accident, the pilot/builder used a viscous lubricant to grease the bearings in the propeller assembly. According to the lubricant manufacturer, the lubricant has a high viscosity and was designed for low-speed automotive and trucking applications not for aviation use. Lubricants with high viscosities can cause the bearing to skid, which can result in rapid overheating and failure of the bearing.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Aircraft maintenance event during prior to flight
  2. Powerplant sys/comp malf/fail during enroute (cruise) defining event
  3. Off-field or emergency landing during emergency descent
  4. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during emergency descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Grease › Incorrect service/maintenance
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft propeller/rotor › Propeller system › Propeller hub section › Incorrect service/maintenance
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft propeller/rotor › Propeller system › Propeller hub section › Malfunction
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Maintenance › Scheduled/routine maintenance › Owner/builder
  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Owner/builder

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 1,418.3 hours in all; 242.1 in this make and model; 21.7 in the last 90 days; 9.6 in the last 30 days; 1,418.3 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: March 27, 2014
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 247 hours
  • Last inspection: condition inspection, July 9, 2013; 38 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,700 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Subaru EJ 25 (piston); 247 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: W78 South Boston VA at 12:30 pm
  • Destination: SFQ Suffolk VA
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 020° at 7 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 70°F (21°C), dew point 59°F (15°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.15 inHg
  • Observation at 1:35 pm from SFQ, 4 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

13 documents, released by the NTSB on April 8, 2015. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Other NTSB records under N6RP the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

2007-10-02DFW08CA006 · accident near Halifax, VA · substantial damage · no injuries
2002-04-30CHI02LA118 · accident near Racine, WI · substantial damage · minor injuries

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.