Vertical Aviation Technologies Hummingbird accident near Spring Branch, Texas, April 29, 2024
On April 29, 2024 at about 8:12 pm local time, a 2012 Vertical Aviation Technologies Hummingbird (helicopter), an amateur-built aircraft,, registered N829SH, was destroyed in an accident during enroute near Spring Branch, Texas. It was an air-drop flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
A total loss of engine power for undetermined reasons, which resulted in a forced landing and a subsequent impact with terrain.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- April 29, 2024 · about 8:12 pm local time
- Place
- Spring Branch, Texas · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 2 people were killed.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Vertical Aviation Technologies Hummingbird 260L, built 2012, amateur-built
- Registration
- N829SH · registry record · serial 1146
- Damage
- Destroyed
- Flight
- Air-drop flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The pilot departed in the experimental helicopter with a pilot-rated passenger to perform a golf ball drop for a charity event. Flight track data showed that the beginning of the flight was not captured, as the first data point indicated the helicopter was in flight and was approximately 4.3 miles to the northeast of the departure airport and about 1.8 miles to the northwest of the planned golf ball drop location. The data showed the helicopter flying to the southwest of the first data point. The helicopter continued to travel to the southwest, and it then turned to the southeast where the data terminated shortly thereafter at the accident site, which was located about 1.4 miles to the northwest of the departure airport. Multiple witnesses near the accident site heard the engine produce sputtering and coughing noises just prior to impact. Security camera footage showed the helicopter impact a grass field in a residential area, in front of a house. A postimpact explosion and fire occurred, which consumed the wreckage. While no mechanical anomalies were found during the airframe and the engine examination, the examination was limited due to the extensive fire damage present. Multiple golf balls were found in the wreckage, which is indicative that the golf ball drop was not completed. The recovered flight track data showed that the helicopter was possibly flying back to the departure airport; however, the intended flight path was not established. The pilot had previously contacted the helicopter kit manufacturer about ethanol in fuel “eating up” the fuel bladder in the helicopter and causing the fuel lines to “clog.” The kit manufacturer offered to sell the pilot a new fuel bladder to install in the helicopter, but they never heard back from the pilot. According to the FAA, ethanol in automobile fuel is not compatible with the rubber seals and other materials used in aircraft, which could cause fuel system deterioration and malfunction. The current helicopter maintenance records were not available for review, and the investigation was unable to determine what maintenance had been performed on the airframe and the engine in the several years prior to the accident. Based upon the statements of multiple witnesses, the engine likely sustained a total loss of engine power, which resulted in a forced landing and a subsequent impact with terrain. While it is possible that the cause of the loss of the engine power may have been due to the deterioration of the fuel system from the presence of ethanol in fuel, the extensive fire damage precluded examination. Due to heart disease, the pilot was at increased risk of a sudden impairing or incapacitating cardiac event, including angina, arrhythmia, or heart attack. There is no autopsy evidence that such an event occurred. However, such an event does not leave reliable autopsy evidence if it occurs immediately before death. The pilot’s toxicological results indicated use of gabapentin, which the FAA considers a “do not fly” medication. Based on the gabapentin levels measured in the pilot’s heart blood, he was possibly experiencing some effects from his use of the gabapentin; however, specific effects are uncertain and whether he may have been impaired could not be determined based on the level detected alone.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Attempted remediation/recovery during enroute
- Autorotation Off-field or emergency landing
- Explosion (post-impact) during post (impact)
- Fire/smoke (post-impact) during post (impact)
- Unknown or undetermined during enroute defining event
- Hard landing during landing
The NTSB's findings
- Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine (reciprocating) › (general) › Unknown/Not determined
Pilot
- Certificate: airline transport pilot, flight instructor, private
- Ratings: single-engine land; instructor: helicopter; instructor: instrument helicopter; instrument: helicopter; rotorcraft: helicopter
- Flight time: 5,750 hours in all; 750 in this make and model
- Last flight review: September 25, 2022
- Medical certificate: Class 3 (without waivers/limitations)
- Seat: rgt
- Injury: fatal
Pilot-Rated Passenger
- Certificate: commercial pilot
- Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 1,201 hours in all
- Medical certificate: Class 2 (without waivers/limitations)
- Seat: rear
- Injury: fatal
The aircraft
- Last inspection: inspection type not recorded
- Maximum gross weight: 2,800 lb
- Seats: 4
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: General Motors LS7 (piston); 0 hours total
- Fire on the ground
The flight
- Departed from: 1T7 Spring Branch TX at 8:00 pm
- Destination: 1T7 Spring Branch TX
- Flight plan: none
- A second pilot was aboard
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: a few clouds at 4,700 ft
- Temperature: 91°F (33°C), dew point 70°F (21°C)
- Altimeter: 29.83 inHg
- Observation at 2:51 pm from KBAZ, 22 miles away
Weather report (METAR): KBAZ 291951Z VRB05KT 10SM FEW047 FEW060 33/21 A2983 RMK AO2 SLP091 T03330206
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 | |||
| Passengers | 1 |
Photographs from the investigation 12 pictures from the NTSB's docket, as the NTSB released them
Photograph 1 – View of the helicopter at the airport just prior to the accident
Photograph 2 – View of the helicopter at the airport just prior to the accident
Photograph 3 – View of the helicopter at the airport just prior to the accident
Photograph 4 – View of the wreckage in front of a house
Photograph 5 – View of the wreckage in front of a house
Photograph 6 – View of the wreckage in front of a house
Photograph 7 – View of the engine at the accident site
Photograph 8 – View of various golf balls at the accident site
Photograph 9 – View of the main rotor blade remnants during the airframe examination at the accident site
Photograph 10 – View of the engine during the engine examination at the accident site
Photograph 11 – View of the pilot’s fuel container at his hangar at the airport
Photograph 12 – View of the pilot’s fuel funnel at his hangar at the airportThe NTSB's photographs with the NTSB's captions, at screen size. Open a picture to see it full size or to report one that should not be shown.
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
20 documents, released by the NTSB on June 10, 2026. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
