Piper PA-30 accident near Pond Creek, Oklahoma, March 17, 2022
On March 17, 2022 at about 9:38 pm local time, a 1967 Piper PA-30, registered N8357Y, was destroyed in an accident during enroute (cruise) near Pond Creek, Oklahoma. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 3 people were killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The pilot’s loss of control of the airplane, resulting in an in-flight breakup.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- March 17, 2022 · about 9:38 pm local time
- Place
- Pond Creek, Oklahoma · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 3 people were killed.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Piper PA-30, built 1967 · all PA-30s on the register
- Registration
- N8357Y · no longer on the register · serial 30-1504
- Damage
- Destroyed
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The non-instrument-rated pilot and 2 passengers departed on a visual flight rules cross-country flight. Air Traffic Control (ATC) radar and Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) data indicated that after takeoff the airplane tracked north and climbed to a cruise altitude of 8,500 ft and then later climbed to 16,500 ft. About an hour and 25 minutes later, the airplane began a descent and turned momentarily to the east. The airplane then turned west and back to the north while it descended. The ground speed decreased from over 200 kts to under 100 kts. Mode C position reporting data was lost followed by the loss of all track data. The airplane was not in contact, nor was it required to be in contact, with ATC. A witness in the area reported that he heard what sounded like a motocross bike engine revving to full throttle. He then looked up and saw what he initially thought was a weather balloon coming straight down. He realized it was an airplane and videoed the airplane in its descent. The airplane was in a right-hand nose-down spin. The video showed the airplane descend until, moments before impacting terrain, it became obscured by tall grass. In the video, the airplane’s aft fuselage and empennage were separated and neither the propellers nor the outboard wings and fuel tip tanks were seen. Instrument meteorological conditions (IMC) existed in the area, where Mode C position reporting and all track data was unavailable. A postaccident examination of the airplane revealed no mechanical failures or malfunctions that would have precluded normal operation. The airplane had a serviced oxygen system; however, no oxygen masks or cannulas were found in the wreckage, and the pilot’s mechanic and flight instructor stated that they were not kept on board the airplane. Federal Aviation Regulations require all occupants on board to use supplemental oxygen above 15,000 ft mean sea level. The pilot’s operation of the airplane above this altitude for almost 90 minutes would have likely led to a performance impairment resulting from hypoxia. The airplane’s track deviations away from its intended destination could have been the result of one or more of the following: 1) an attempt to maneuver the airplane to avoid IMC; 2) the pilot’s impaired performance as a result of hypoxia; and/or 3) the onset of spatial disorientation. However, there was insufficient evidence from which to determine the degree to which hypoxia and spatial disorientation played a role in the sequence of events leading to the airplane’s departure from controlled flight.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during enroute (cruise)
- Loss of control in flight during enroute (cruise) defining event
The NTSB's findings
- Personnel issues › Psychological › Perception/orientation/illusion › Spatial disorientation › Pilot
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
- Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Clouds › Contributed to outcome
- Personnel issues › Physical › Impairment/incapacitation › Hypoxia/anoxia › Pilot
Pilot
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land
- Flight time: 275.4 hours in all; 195.8 in this make and model
- Last flight review: May 8, 2020
- Medical certificate: Class 3
- Seat: left
- Injury: fatal
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 2,290 hours
- Last inspection: annual inspection, June 1, 2021
- Seats: 4
- Landing gear: retractable
- Engine 1: Lycoming IO-320 SERIES (piston); 0 hours total
- Engine 2: Lycoming IO-320 SERIES (piston); 0 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: MML Mineral Wells TX at 8:06 pm
- Destination: Lincoln NE
- Flight plan: none
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 190° at 4 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: overcast at 90 ft; scat at 50 ft
- Temperature: 70°F (21°C), dew point 45°F (7°C)
- Altimeter: 29.64 inHg
- Observation at 4:45 pm from KWDG, 17 miles away
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 | |||
| Passengers | 2 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
18 documents, released by the NTSB on August 15, 2023. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
