The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN16FA361 · Final report

Piper PA 46-310P accident near Chariton, Iowa, September 7, 2016

On September 7, 2016 at about 5:19 pm local time, a 1984 Piper PA 46-310P, registered N465JM, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (descent) near Chariton, Iowa. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The non-instrument-rated pilot's loss of control due to spatial disorientation in instrument meteorological conditions, which resulted in an exceedance of the airplane's design stress limitations and a subsequent in-flight breakup. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's decision to continue visual flight into convective instrument meteorological conditions.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
September 7, 2016 · about 5:19 pm local time
Place
Chariton, Iowa · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was killed.
Weather
instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
Aircraft
Piper PA 46-310P, built 1984 · all PA 46-310Ps on the register
Registration
N465JM · no longer on the register · serial 46-8408042
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The noninstrument-rated private pilot was conducting a visual flight rules (VFR) cross-country flight while receiving VFR flight following services from air traffic control.  Radar data and voice communication information indicated that the airplane was in cruise flight as the pilot deviated around convective weather near his destination. The controller issued a weather advisory to the pilot concerning areas of moderate to extreme precipitation along his route; the pilot responded that he saw the weather on the airplane's NEXRAD weather display system and planned to deviate around it before resuming course. About 3 minutes later, the pilot stated that he was around the weather and requested to start his descent direct toward his destination. The controller advised the pilot to descend at his discretion. Radar showed the airplane in a descending right turn before radar contact was lost at 2,900 ft mean sea level. There were no eyewitnesses, and search personnel reported rain and thunderstorms in the area about the time of the accident. The distribution of the wreckage was consistent with an in-flight breakup. Examination of the airframe revealed overload failures of the empennage and wings. No pre-impact airframe structural anomalies were found, and the propeller showed evidence of rotation at the time of impact. Further, there was no evidence of pilot impairment or incapacitation. Review of weather information indicated that the pilot most likely encountered instrument meteorological conditions as the airplane descended during the last several minutes of flight. During this time, it is likely that the pilot became disoriented while attempting to maneuver in convective, restricted visibility conditions, and lost control of the airplane. The transition from visual to instrument flight conditions would have been conducive to the development of spatial disorientation; the turning descent before the loss of radar contact and the in-flight breakup are also consistent with a loss of control due to spatial disorientation.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Other weather encounter during enroute (cruise)
  2. Inflight upset during enroute (descent)
  3. Loss of control in flight during enroute (descent) defining event
  4. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Psychological › Perception/orientation/illusion › Spatial disorientation › Pilot
  • cause Personnel issues › Experience/knowledge › Experience/qualifications › Total instrument experience › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › (general) › Not attained/maintained
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft structures › (general) › (general) › Capability exceeded
  • factor Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
  • factor Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Convective weather › Thunderstorm › Decision related to condition

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 242 hours in all; 118 in this make and model
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: annual inspection, January 15, 2016
  • Maximum gross weight: 4,100 lb
  • Seats: 6
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Continental TSIO-550 (piston); 0 hours total
  • Not recorded

The flight

  • Departed from: OJC Olathe KS at 4:30 pm
  • Destination: IKV Ankeny IA
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 220° at 9 knots, gusting 17
  • Visibility: 1 statute miles
  • Sky: broken clouds at 4,500 ft; scat at 1,700 ft
  • Temperature: 75°F (24°C), dew point 73°F (23°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.95 inHg
  • Observation at 5:15 pm from CNC, 12 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

12 documents, released by the NTSB on June 12, 2018. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.