The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR22LA236 · Final report

Bell 206B accident near Merced, California, June 24, 2022

On June 24, 2022 at about 4:05 pm local time, a 1972 Bell 206B (helicopter), registered N915B, was substantially damaged in an accident during maneuvering (low-alt flying) near Merced, California. It was an aerial application (crop spraying) flight under agricultural flying rules (Part 137). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The in-flight failure of the engine-to-transmission drive shaft due to a fatigue fracture of one of the KAflex flex frames caused by a loose bolt, which resulted in a total loss of power to the transmission and a subsequent hard landing.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
June 24, 2022 · about 4:05 pm local time
Place
Merced, California · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Bell 206B, built 1972 · all 206Bs on the register
Registration
N915B · no longer on the register · serial 720
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Aerial application (crop spraying) flight · agricultural flying rules (Part 137)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot reported that he was on an agricultural spray run. He had just performed a 180° turn and, about six feet above ground level (agl), he felt a vibration. He then felt a “snap” and the helicopter began to rotate left. He applied right pedal, entered an autorotation, and attempted to decrease the airspeed. He tried to perform a run-on landing in the 4-ft-tall corn, but upon touchdown, the helicopter rolled up on its nose and the main rotor blades severed the tail boom.   A postaccident examination revealed that the KAflex driveshaft was separated and there were several sheared bolts and pieces of the KAflex located underneath the engine. Subsequent metallurgical examination determined that the failure of the KAflex coupling resulted from fatigue observed in two flex plate segments and an adjacent attachment bolt, indicating these components were the initial points of failure. The fatigue cracking initiated at areas adjacent to wear and material loss. With the fracture of flex plates and bolts, the interconnect and end fitting could rotate, resulting in the assembly failure. One flex plate and bolt exhibited more fatigue, suggesting longer crack propagation and earlier fracture, while thumbnail cracks on a second flex plate indicated incipient propagation when other components failed in overstress. The bolt and flex plate with fatigue features showed severe wear and loss of cross-sectional area, potentially concentrating stress at these locations. Although the investigation could not determine which fractured first, the joint had become loose, likely due to wear over time or inadequate assembly/maintenance. Most of the fractured bolts did not have discernable fracture features, likely lost to post fracture wear and battering. Visual inspections during maintenance might reveal a loose bolt, but fatigue cracks in these components would be more difficult to detect, leading to rapid propagation in rotary aircraft parts.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Sys/Comp malf/fail (non-power) during maneuvering (low-alt flying) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Flight control system › (general) › Incorrect service/maintenance
  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Flight control system › (general) › Failure

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; single-engine sea; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Flight time: 25,150 hours in all; 11,254 in this make and model; 76 in the last 90 days; 65 in the last 30 days; 25,079 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: January 21, 2021
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rear
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: annual inspection
  • Maximum gross weight: 3,200 lb
  • Seats: 5
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Rolls Royce 250-C20B (turboshaft); 0 hours total
  • Operator: Bettencourt Flying Service INC

The flight

  • Departed from: Atwater CA at 12:55 pm
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 330° at 5 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 88°F (31°C), dew point 54°F (12°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.84 inHg
  • Observation at 9:53 am from KMCE, 4 miles away

Weather report (METAR): KMCE 241653Z AUTO 33005KT 10SM CLR 31/12 A2984 RMK AO2 SLP103 T03060117

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

5 documents, released by the NTSB on April 25, 2024. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.