The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR21LA209 · Final report

Cessna TR182 accident near Prescott, Arizona, May 27, 2021

On May 27, 2021 at about 6:30 pm local time, a 1979 Cessna TR182, registered N155CT, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing (landing roll) near Prescott, Arizona (Prescott Rgnl - Ernest A Love airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s delayed deployment of the landing gear, which resulted in the collapse of the main landing gear.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
May 27, 2021 · about 6:30 pm local time
Place
Prescott, Arizona · Prescott Rgnl - Ernest A Love · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna TR182, built 1979 · all TR182s on the register
Registration
N155CT · registry record · serial R18201277
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot reported that, after he was established on the downwind leg for landing, he verified that each of the airplane’s three landing gear were in the down position through the landing gear indicator on the instrument panel and a visual inspection using a mirror located on the right-wing strut, which allowed him to see the undercarriage. The pilot stated that he verified that the landing gear was in the down position a second time after he turned onto the final approach leg. The pilot stated that his approach to the runway was normal with 20° of wing flaps extended and he could hear the stall warning horn as he felt the landing gear contact the runway. Immediately after the airplane touched down, the pilot felt the airplane sink slowly to the left side. The airplane spun slowly to the left and came to rest. The left horizontal stabilizer and elevator were substantially damaged. A postaccident examination of the landing gear system revealed that the down locks for both of the main landing gear exceeded the manufacturer’s maximum clearance. According to the service facility, the resulting play could have caused the main landing gear down lock to retract after the airplane touched down if the landing gear motor lost pressure while the gear was deployed. Further, according to the manufacturer, in addition to a loss of hydraulic pressure, the landing gear required a ground clearance of about 16 inches for it to retract. This could have occurred if the airplane bounced, but the pilot reported that the touchdown was smooth, and the airplane did not bounce. Additionally, the landing gear motor functioned normally during postaccident testing; therefore, it is unlikely that the system lost hydraulic pressure. The service facility reported that the nose landing gear on this airplane normally becomes fully extended before the main landing gear during deployment and photographs of the accident site revealed that the nose landing gear was still deployed while both main landing gear were retracted. As the postaccident examination and analysis did not reveal any anomalies with the landing gear that could have caused the accident, it is likely that the pilot deployed the landing gear late and did not allow the main landing gear to complete its full range of travel before the airplane touched down. This likely resulted in the main landing gear to collapse.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Landing gear collapse during landing (landing roll) defining event
  2. Landing gear not configured during landing

The NTSB's findings

  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Landing gear system › (general) › Incorrect use/operation
  • Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Monitoring equip/instruments › Pilot
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of equip/system › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 1,294 hours in all; 564 in this make and model; 33 in the last 90 days; 12 in the last 30 days; 1,193 as pilot in command; 59 on instruments
  • Last flight review: April 27, 2021
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 3,566 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, May 15, 2020; 107.5 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 3,100 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-540-L3C5D (piston); 1,689 hours total
  • Operator: Outsideloop LLC

The flight

  • Departed from: E25 Wickenburg AZ at 6:05 pm
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 03R/, 7,619 ft by 150 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Temperature: 79°F (26°C), dew point 19°F (-7°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.15 inHg
  • Observation at 11:53 am from KPRC

Weather report (METAR): KPRC 271853Z VRB04KT 10SM CLR 26/M07 A3015 RMK AO2 SLP137 T02561067

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

6 documents, released by the NTSB on December 9, 2021. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.