Piper PA 30 accident near Vaughn, New Mexico, July 15, 2020
On July 15, 2020 at about 6:02 pm local time, a 1967 Piper PA 30, registered N8488Y, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (cruise) near Vaughn, New Mexico. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The total loss of power in the right engine due to fuel starvation. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s failure to follow the manufacturer-recommended procedure after the loss of power in the right engine.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- July 15, 2020 · about 6:02 pm local time
- Place
- Vaughn, New Mexico · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Piper PA 30 No Series, built 1967 · all PA 30s on the register
- Registration
- N8488Y · no longer on the register · serial 30-1651
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The pilot stated that after an uneventful takeoff with a full fuel load, he proceeded to his destination. After the climb, he positioned the fuel selectors to the auxiliary tanks for about 45 minutes and then switched them back to the main fuel tank position. About 3 hours and 15 minutes into the flight, the right engine surged twice and subsequently quit producing power. He briefly tried switching to the auxiliary fuel tank, but the engine failed to restart. The pilot did not try the cross-feed selection. The pilot notified air traffic control that he was making an off-airport emergency landing because he was unable to maintain altitude and there were no nearby airports. The airplane touched down on desert terrain and during the landing roll, the right wing collided with a fence. There was no fuel in the right main tank, minimal fuel in the right auxiliary tank, and fuel was found in the right fuel selector bowl. There was no evidence of leakage or blockage in the right fuel system. The left fuel tanks contained fuel. The manufacturer recommends that in the event of an engine emergency, the pilot should use the cross-feed option. Use of the cross-feed selection would have allowed fuel from the left-wing tanks to be fed to the right engine. It is likely that if the pilot had used the cross-feed, the right engine would have had sufficient fuel to run from the left fuel tanks. The right engine was put on a test stand and was run at various rpms with no defects noted. A postaccident examination of the engine revealed no evidence of a mechanical malfunction or failure that would have precluded normal operation of the right engine or fuel system.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Loss of engine power (total) during enroute (cruise) defining event
The NTSB's findings
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of equip/system › Pilot
- Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Fuel › Fluid management
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of policy/procedure › Pilot
Pilot
- Certificate: airline transport pilot
- Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; single-engine sea; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 2,595 hours in all; 161 in this make and model; 6 in the last 90 days; 3 in the last 30 days; 2,327 as pilot in command
- Last flight review: May 15, 2019
- Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
- Seat: left
- Injury: no injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 4,760 hours
- Last inspection: annual inspection, April 30, 2020; 21 hours since
- Maximum gross weight: 2,381 lb
- Seats: 4
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine 1: Lycoming IO-320 SERIES (piston); 4,781 hours total
- Engine 2: Lycoming IO-320 SERIES (piston); 4,781 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: KAUS Austin TX at 2:00 pm
- Destination: SAF Santa Fe NM
- Flight plan: none
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 330° at 12 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: clear
- Temperature: 79°F (26°C), dew point 43°F (6°C)
- Altimeter: 30.31 inHg
- Observation at 4:53 pm from KCQC, 33 miles away
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 | |||
| Passengers | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
8 documents, released by the NTSB on September 13, 2022. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Engine Data Monitor - Specialist's Factual Report | PDF, 7 pages | View Download |
| 2 | Attachment 1 to Engine Data Monitor Specialist's Factual Report -- Tabular Data | data file | Download |
| 3 | Attachment 2 to Engine Data Monitor Specialist's Factual Report -- Tabular Data | data file | Download |
| 4 | Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 | PDF, 7 pages | View Download |
| 5 | Examination Notes | PDF, 17 pages | View Download |
| 6 | Record of Conversations | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 7 | Jpi Data Formatted to Show Accident | PDF, 53 pages | View Download |
| 8 | Statement of Party Representatives to NTSB Investigation | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
