The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR20LA170 · Final report

Amateur-built Kitfox accident near Lander, Wyoming, June 7, 2020

On June 7, 2020 at about 2:30 pm local time, a 1995 amateur-built Kitfox, registered N595KF, was substantially damaged in an accident during maneuvering (low-alt flying) near Lander, Wyoming. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed and 1 person was seriously injured. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The inexperienced pilot’s exceedance of the airplane’s critical angle-of-attack during a turn at high density altitude, which resulted in an accelerated stall and impact with water. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s poor judgment to continue the flight despite the airplane’s limited performance during the accident flight.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
June 7, 2020 · about 2:30 pm local time
Place
Lander, Wyoming · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was killed and 1 person was seriously injured.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Amateur-built Kitfox, built 1995
Registration
N595KF · no longer on the register · serial 190
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The sport pilot departed in the experimental, amateur-built airplane from a high-altitude airport with a passenger toward a mountain range. Due to the airplane’s performance limitations in the high-altitude environment, the pilot was forced to circle twice as he climbed. After he entered the mountain range, he completed a circling descent to about 500 ft above ground level (agl) to overfly a lake located about 8,500 ft mean sea level (msl). The pilot then flew southwest over the lake at the planned altitude but encountered turbulence and downdrafts that forced the airplane to descend to about 25 ft agl. He applied full throttle to build airspeed and to climb, but the airplane did not climb. The pilot was forced to perform a left turn to avoid rising terrain to his right and obstacles ahead of him. However, during the maneuver, the airplane pitched up and turned left. It then immediately entered a nose-down attitude, consistent with an accelerated stall, and impacted the water. Postaccident examination of the airframe and engine revealed no mechanical anomalies. Density altitude at the lake was about 9,500 ft. There were no charts to compute the airplane’s performance at 8,500 ft mean sea level but based on the pilot’s recollection of how the airplane was flying, the airplane’s climb performance was likely degraded at the density altitude he was operating. Any downdrafts would have further inhibited the airplane from a climb. The pilot likely exceeded the airplane’s critical angle-of-attack when he initiated a climbing left turn in such conditions. The pilot had limited practical experience flying in mountain environments and his most recent training took place about 1 year prior. These factors likely contributed to his poor judgment in choosing to continue the planned flight to a low altitude in a high-density altitude mountain environment despite the airplane’s deficient rate of climb.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Low altitude operation/event during maneuvering (low-alt flying) defining event
  2. Aerodynamic stall/spin during maneuvering (low-alt flying)
  3. Other weather encounter during maneuvering (low-alt flying)

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Wind › Downdraft › Effect on operation
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Turbulence › (general) › Effect on operation
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Wind › Downdraft › Awareness of condition
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Angle of attack › Not attained/maintained
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Temp/humidity/pressure › High density altitude › Effect on equipment
  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: sport pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 139 hours in all; 121 in this make and model; 22 in the last 90 days; 8 in the last 30 days; 112 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: May 20, 2019
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: serious injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 633.2 hours
  • Last inspection: condition inspection, December 14, 2019; 24.4 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 950 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Rotax 532UL (piston); 275 hours total
  • Fire on the ground

The flight

  • Departed from: LND Lander WY at 1:30 pm
  • Destination: LND Lander WY
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 030° at 3 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 54°F (12°C), dew point 41°F (5°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.71 inHg
  • Observation at 1:53 pm from LND, 10 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

8 documents, released by the NTSB on May 26, 2022. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.