The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR19LA194 · Final report

Bell 47G 3B 1 accident near Mosby, Montana, July 13, 2019

On July 13, 2019 at about 8:30 pm local time, a 1964 Bell 47G 3B 1 (helicopter), registered N3078G, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing near Mosby, Montana. It was an aerial observation flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were seriously injured and 1 person had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s failure to account for environmental conditions conducive to a loss of tail rotor effectiveness, which resulted in a loss of tail rotor effectiveness and subsequent loss of control. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s inappropriate application of power during the recovery.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
July 13, 2019 · about 8:30 pm local time
Place
Mosby, Montana · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people were seriously injured and 1 person had minor injuries.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Bell 47G 3B 1, built 1964 · all 47G 3B 1s on the register
Registration
N3078G · no longer on the register · serial 2925
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Aerial observation flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot had refueled the helicopter, bringing the total fuel on board to about 58 gallons, and departed with two passengers for a 15-mile flight to a private ranch. After arriving at the destination, the pilot circled the area and determined the wind direction. He established a normal approach path into the wind to land near a building. While about 30 to 40 feet above ground level, the helicopter entered an uncommanded yaw to the right. Despite the pilot’s control inputs, which included application of full left pedal, the helicopter continued to yaw to the right. The pilot attempted to recover and applied forward cyclic to gain airspeed to go-around. The helicopter continued to yaw right and ascended above the building as described by the two passengers and a witness located near the building. During the recovery attempt, the pilot recalled initially lowering the collective when the yaw first occurred, but did not recall raising or lowering it again. The pilot lost control of the helicopter, which subsequently impacted the ground in a silage pit about 250 feet north of the intended landing area. An engine test run and airframe examination revealed no mechanical failures or malfunctions with the helicopter that would have precluded normal operation. During the approach, the helicopter was operating in a high-power demand condition due to high density altitude, high gross weight, and while near the out-of-ground effect boundary and at a slow airspeed. These conditions reduced the amount of yaw control effectiveness available to counter an uncommanded right yaw. Additionally, the pilot’s selected approach path placed the helicopter on the leeward side of a building and likely exposed the helicopter to disturbed air that disrupted the airflow entering the main rotor and tail rotor and initiated the uncommanded right yaw/loss of tail rotor effectiveness. During the recovery attempt, the pilot likely increased the collective while applying full left pedal, which resulted in the ascent described by the passengers and witness. The added power from the increased collective would also have resulted in an increased right yaw rate and the subsequent loss of control.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control in flight during landing defining event
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during landing
  3. Loss of tail rotor effectiveness during landing

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Prop/rotor parameters › Not attained/maintained
  • Personnel issues › Experience/knowledge › Knowledge › Knowledge of meteorologic cond › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: instructor: helicopter; instrument: helicopter; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Flight time: 1,125 hours in all; 36 in this make and model; 1,037 as pilot in command
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: serious injuries

Passenger

  • Seat: ctr
  • Injury: serious injuries

Passenger

  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: minor injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 7,328.1 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, April 16, 2019; 450.9 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,950 lb
  • Seats: 3
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Rolls-Royce 250-C20B (turboshaft); 2,874 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: Benzien MT at 8:07 pm
  • Destination: Mosby MT

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 160° at 7 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: not recorded; not recorded
  • Temperature: 88°F (31°C), dew point 59°F (15°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.00 inHg
  • Observation at 8:22 pm from LWT, 5 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers11

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

10 documents, released by the NTSB on March 17, 2022. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Other NTSB records under N3078G the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

1993-11-12ATL94LA014 · accident near Atmore, AL · substantial damage · no injuries

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.