The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR18LA069 · Final report

Mooney M20E accident near Skyforest, California, January 17, 2018

On January 17, 2018 at about 7:30 pm local time, a 1965 Mooney M20E, registered N5562Q, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (climb to cruise) near Skyforest, California. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was seriously injured and 1 person had minor injuries; 2 others were unhurt. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s failure to establish the proper airspeed after departure and to maintain adequate clearance from a ridgeline in high-density and downdraft conditions and his subsequent exceedance of the airplane’s critical angle of attack, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall with insufficient altitude to recover. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s inadequate preflight weight and balance calculations, which failed to take into account the gross weight, high-altitude conditions, and center of gravity limit.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
January 17, 2018 · about 7:30 pm local time
Place
Skyforest, California · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was seriously injured and 1 person had minor injuries; 2 others were unhurt.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Mooney M20E NO SERIES, built 1965 · all M20Es on the register
Registration
N5562Q · no longer on the register · serial 634
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The private pilot reported that, a few minutes after departure for a cross-country flight and as the airplane neared the top of a ridgeline, it encountered a downdraft, aerodynamically stalled, and then impacted terrain. One of the passengers reported hearing an aural tone, which was consistent with the stall warning horn, for several seconds before impact. Weight and balance calculations determined that the airplane was loaded near its maximum gross weight and had exceeded the forward center of gravity limit, which would have increased the airplane's stall speed during the accident flight. The calculated density altitude was about 6,550 ft, which likely reduced the available power and affected the climb rate. A video of the final moments of the accident flight showed the airplane about 25 ft above ground level when the airplane entered a high pitch attitude, followed immediately by a rapid descent, consistent with an aerodynamic stall. According to the pilot, the airplane was about 1,000 ft above terrain when it stalled; however, given the location of the camera and the pitch attitude that was observed, it is likely that the airplane was within about 50 ft of terrain as the airplane crested the ridgeline. The pilot should not have attempted to cross the ridgeline at such a low altitude; a higher altitude would have provided a clearance zone to avoid turbulence and downdrafts. The pilot's failure to cross at a higher altitude resulted in the airplane's encounter with a downdraft with insufficient altitude to recover from the stall. The pilot reported that there was no evidence of any preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Other weather encounter during enroute (climb to cruise)
  2. Aerodynamic stall/spin during enroute (climb to cruise) defining event
  3. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during enroute (climb to cruise)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Planning/preparation › Flight planning/navigation › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Angle of attack › Capability exceeded
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Altitude › Not attained/maintained
  • factor Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Aircraft capability › CG/weight distribution › Capability exceeded
  • factor Personnel issues › Task performance › Planning/preparation › Weight/balance calculations › Pilot
  • factor Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Aircraft capability › Maximum weight › Not specified
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Wind › Downdraft › Effect on operation
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Temp/humidity/pressure › High density altitude › Effect on operation

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: serious injuries

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: inspection type not recorded
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,575 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming IO360 SER (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: SBD San Bernardino CA at 7:00 pm
  • Destination: L35 Big Bear City CA
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Visibility: 7 statute miles
  • Sky: scat at 15,000 ft
  • Temperature: 73°F (23°C), dew point 34°F (1°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.19 inHg
  • Observation at 6:48 pm from KSBD, 9 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers12

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

6 documents, released by the NTSB on November 15, 2018. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.