Bellanca 7GCAA accident near Glamis, California, November 25, 2016
On November 25, 2016 at about 7:45 pm local time, a 1974 Bellanca 7GCAA, registered N88373, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach near Glamis, California. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed and 1 person was seriously injured. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The pilot's improper decision to attempt a downwind landing and his failure to maintain adequate airspeed while maneuvering during a go-around and subsequent landing attempt, which resulted in exceedance of the airplane's critical angle of attack and an aerodynamic stall. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's inadequately controlled depression, which impaired his decision-making.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- November 25, 2016 · about 7:45 pm local time
- Place
- Glamis, California · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 1 person was killed and 1 person was seriously injured.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Bellanca 7GCAA NO SERIES, built 1974 · all 7GCAAs on the register
- Registration
- N88373 · no longer on the register · serial 304-74
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The private pilot was giving a ride to the passenger and was relocating the airplane to a nearby private airstrip for overnight parking. Witnesses located near the airstrip observed the airplane touch down about midfield on the southwest runway while traveling at a high rate of speed. According to the witnesses, the wind was from the east-northeast at 15 to 20 miles per hour, which was a downwind condition for the landing. The pilot performed a go-around, and the airplane pitched upward and banked steeply to the right. The pilot executed a 180° turn to parallel the runway and leveled off at an altitude of about 100 to 150 ft above ground level. Shortly thereafter, the airplane entered a steep right turn toward the runway, and the witnesses lost sight of it. Examination of the accident site indicated that the airplane impacted terrain in a near vertical attitude about 600 ft short of the approach end of the dirt runway. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed no evidence of any preexisting mechanical malfunction that would have precluded normal operation. The witness observations of the pilot's steep turns and the airplane's near-vertical impact with terrain are consistent with the pilot failing to maintain adequate airspeed while maneuvering aggressively in the traffic pattern, resulting in the airplane exceeding its critical angle of attack and an aerodynamic stall. The pilot's autopsy results revealed that he had coronary artery disease without evidence of an old or new heart attack. Although this condition placed the pilot at increased risk for a cardiovascular event, there was no evidence that the pilot's coronary artery disease impaired the pilot or contributed to the accident as he was actively maneuvering the airplane up until the stall. Toxicology tests revealed that the pilot had therapeutic levels of the antidepressant sertraline in has blood at the time of the accident. However, sertraline is not known to cause impairment, and it is unlikely that the effects of sertraline impaired the pilot. In addition, the tests revealed that the pilot had a blood level of the antidepressant trazodone well below therapeutic levels, making it unlikely that the effects of trazadone impaired the pilot. Review of the pilot's personal medical records revealed that he had major depression that was not adequately controlled. This condition is associated with significant cognitive degradation, particularly in executive functioning. Cognitive degradation may not improve even with treatment and remission of the depressed episode, and patients with severe disease are more significantly affected than those with fewer symptoms or episodes. Although the pilot likely had the skill and experience necessary to safely conduct the flight, he demonstrated poor decision-making and executive function when he decided to attempt a landing with a significant tailwind and elected to maneuver aggressively in the traffic pattern while attempting to perform a go-around and a subsequent landing attempt. It is likely that the pilot's inadequately controlled depression impaired his decision-making and contributed to the accident.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Other weather encounter during landing
- Landing area overshoot during landing
- Abrupt maneuver during landing (aborted after touchdown)
- Loss of control in flight during approach defining event
- Aerodynamic stall/spin during approach
- Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during approach
The NTSB's findings
- cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
- cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Angle of attack › Not attained/maintained
- cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Airspeed › Not attained/maintained
- factor Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
- factor Personnel issues › Psychological › Mental/emotional state › (general) › Pilot
Pilot
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land
- Flight time: 442.2 hours in all; 205.5 in this make and model; 8.1 in the last 90 days; 2.7 in the last 30 days
- Last flight review: September 30, 2016
- Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
- Seat: frt
- Injury: fatal
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 4,380 hours
- Last inspection: annual inspection, May 9, 2016; 17 hours since
- Seats: 2
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Lycoming O-320-A2D (piston); 0 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: Glamis CA at 7:40 pm
- Destination: Glamis CA
- Flight plan: none
- Runway SW, 3,000 ft by 50 ft
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 350° at 4 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: clear
- Temperature: 73°F (23°C), dew point 23°F (-5°C)
- Altimeter: 30.10 inHg
- Observation at 7:53 pm from MMML, 24 miles away
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 | |||
| Passengers | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
9 documents, released by the NTSB on September 13, 2018. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NTSB Medical Factual Report | PDF, 4 pages | View Download |
| 2 | Global Positioning System Device Specialist's Factual Report | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 3 | Record of Conversation - Witness | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 4 | Record of Conversation - Friend of the Pilot | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 5 | Record of Conversation - Passenger | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 6 | NTSB Accident Site, Airframe, and Engine Examination Summary | PDF, 5 pages | View Download |
| 7 | Statement of Party Representatives to NTSB Investigation - Lycoming | PDF, 14 pages | View Download |
| 8 | Toxicological Report | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 9 | NTSB Photo Array | PDF, 5 pages | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Other NTSB records under N88373 the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
