The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR16LA185 · Final report

Amateur-built ARNOLD AR 6 and amateur-built 3M1C1R accident near Reno, Nevada, September 18, 2016

On September 18, 2016 at about 6:18 pm local time, 2 aircraft, amateur-built ARNOLD AR 6 (N616DH) and amateur-built 3M1C1R (N913FT), were involved in the same accident near Reno, Nevada (Reno/Stead airport). 1 person had minor injuries; 1 other was unhurt. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot of Race 11’s failure to maintain clearance from Race 1 during takeoff, and the insufficient abort procedures specified within the race rules. Contributing to the accident was the pilot of Race 1’s decision to shut down the engine on the runway and his failure to follow existing abort procedures.
The pilot of Race 11’s failure to maintain clearance from Race 1 during takeoff, and the insufficient abort procedures specified within the race rules. Contributing to the accident was the pilot of Race 1’s decision to shut down the engine on the runway and his failure to follow existing abort procedures.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
September 18, 2016 · about 6:18 pm local time
Place
Reno, Nevada · Reno/Stead · map
Type
Accident · collision on the ground
Injuries
1 person had minor injuries; 1 other was unhurt.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft 1
Amateur-built ARNOLD AR 6 NO SERIES
Registration
N616DH · registry record · serial 01
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Air show or air race flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
Aircraft 2
Amateur-built 3M1C1R NO SERIES, built 2011
Registration
N913FT · registry record · serial 013
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Air show or air race flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative for the amateur-built ARNOLD AR 6 final · quoted from the NTSB record

While waiting for the start of a closed air race, eight airplanes were positioned on the runway staggered in three rows; three airplanes in the first row, two in the second row, and three in the third row. The airplane designated as Race 11 was positioned in the middle of the third row, and the airplane designated as Race 1 was positioned on the left side in the second row. Before the race start, all the airplanes were operating at takeoff power waiting for the race start signal. The pilot of Race 1 reported that, just before the start, his engine was not running well and he made the decision to abort and shut the engine down nearly simultaneously with the start of the race. The pilot of Race 11 reported that, once he saw the start flag, he initiated his takeoff roll. As the tail of his airplane came up, he saw Race 1 stationary on the runway and he attempted to swerve out of the way and get his airplane airborne. However, his airplane collided with Race 1. Review of onboard video recordings from both Race 11 and Race 1 as well as witness reports revealed that, when the race started, all the airplanes except for Race 1 began the takeoff sequence. Onboard video from Race 11 revealed that, during the approximate 11 seconds after the takeoff roll commenced, the pilot allowed his airplane to drift left, which resulted in a collision with stationary Race 1. If all the airplanes were aligned correctly, it would have allowed adequate horizontal distance between the second and third rows for airplanes to pass by one another. It is likely that, if the pilot of Race 11 maintained a straight takeoff roll and not allowed his airplane to drift left, the collision may have been avoided. Additional video recordings from witnesses revealed that, at the time of the collision, no red flags were being displayed to signal an abort to the race start. Review of race rules in place at the time of the accident revealed that, at the start of the race, all rows will launch simultaneously; however, anyone aborting take off, "will abort straight ahead and attempt to clear to the end of the runway expeditiously." No written procedures were in place for aborting before the time of the start of the race.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The NTSB's narrative for the amateur-built 3M1C1R final · quoted from the NTSB record

While waiting for the start of a closed air race, eight airplanes were positioned on the runway staggered in three rows; three airplanes in the first row, two in the second row, and three in the third row. The airplane designated as Race 11 was positioned in the middle of the third row, and the airplane designated as Race 1 was positioned on the left side in the second row. Before the race start, all the airplanes were operating at takeoff power waiting for the race start signal. The pilot of Race 1 reported that, just before the start, his engine was not running well and he made the decision to abort and shut the engine down nearly simultaneously with the start of the race. The pilot of Race 11 reported that, once he saw the start flag, he initiated his takeoff roll. As the tail of his airplane came up, he saw Race 1 stationary on the runway and he attempted to swerve out of the way and get his airplane airborne. However, his airplane collided with Race 1. Review of onboard video recordings from both Race 11 and Race 1 as well as witness reports revealed that, when the race started, all the airplanes except for Race 1 began the takeoff sequence. Onboard video from Race 11 revealed that, during the approximate 11 seconds after the takeoff roll commenced, the pilot allowed his airplane to drift left, which resulted in a collision with stationary Race 1. If all the airplanes were aligned correctly, it would have allowed adequate horizontal distance between the second and third rows for airplanes to pass by one another. It is likely that, if the pilot of Race 11 maintained a straight takeoff roll and not allowed his airplane to drift left, the collision may have been avoided. Additional video recordings from witnesses revealed that, at the time of the collision, no red flags were being displayed to signal an abort to the race start. Review of race rules in place at the time of the accident revealed that, at the start of the race, all rows will launch simultaneously; however, anyone aborting take off, "will abort straight ahead and attempt to clear to the end of the runway expeditiously." No written procedures were in place for aborting before the time of the start of the race.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record for the amateur-built ARNOLD AR 6 from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Collision during takeoff/land during takeoff defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • cause Organizational issues › Management › Policy/procedure › Adequacy of policy/proc › Not specified
  • factor Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of policy/procedure › Pilot of other aircraft

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 17,227 hours in all; 64 in this make and model; 183 in the last 90 days; 28 in the last 30 days; 12,956 as pilot in command; 863 on instruments
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: ctr
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 129.6 hours
  • Last inspection: condition inspection, July 21, 2016; 4 hours since
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Continental O-200 (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: RTS Reno NV
  • Destination: RTS Reno NV
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 08, 7,608 ft by 150 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 190° at 4 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 73°F (23°C), dew point 34°F (1°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.19 inHg
  • Observation at 5:55 pm from KRNO, 12 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

The factual record for the amateur-built 3M1C1R from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Collision during takeoff/land during takeoff defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot of other aircraft
  • cause Organizational issues › Management › Policy/procedure › Adequacy of policy/proc › Not specified
  • factor Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of policy/procedure › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: ctr
  • Injury: minor injuries

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: inspection type not recorded
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Continental O-200-D (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: RTS Reno NV
  • Destination: RTS Reno NV
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 08, 7,608 ft by 150 ft

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

About this page

Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, the folder of records gathered during the investigation, shown as the NTSB released them (the NTSB redacts some personal details first) and listed under the NTSB's own titles. This site's own text never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number WPR16LA185.