The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR16LA114 · Final report

Amateur-built Calidus accident near Fruitland, Utah, May 20, 2016

On May 20, 2016 at about 5:00 pm local time, a 2014 amateur-built Calidus (gyroplane), registered N50NE, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (cruise) near Fruitland, Utah. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were seriously injured. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's improper judgment in conducting a flight in a gyroplane over mountainous terrain near its demonstrated maximum operating altitude and his subsequent failure to maintain adequate clearance with terrain during cruise flight in turbulent weather conditions.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
May 20, 2016 · about 5:00 pm local time
Place
Fruitland, Utah · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people were seriously injured.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Amateur-built Calidus, built 2014
Registration
N50NE · no longer on the register · serial C00240
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

After fueling the gyroplane, the private pilot and passenger embarked on a cross-country flight over rugged and mountainous terrain. The pilot reported that, as the gyroplane approached a ridge, about 200 ft above its peak, it encountered strong downdrafts and then descended into a box canyon. Unable to climb the gyroplane to clear terrain, the pilot guided it over a river at the base of the canyon until he could see a landing spot on the shore. As he approached the site and initiated the landing flare, the right wheel struck a boulder, and the gyroplane rolled over and then came to rest in the river. The canyon in which the gyroplane came to rest was at an elevation of about 7,300 ft mean sea level (msl), and the canyon walls rose about 1,000 ft above the accident site to the north and south. The gyroplane's demonstrated maximum operating altitude was 10,000 ft, and the pilot's intended flight route would have required clearing mountain peaks that were at an elevation of 8,200 ft msl. The pilot reported that there were no mechanical malfunctions or failures with the gyroplane. Local wind conditions, along with the rugged terrain, likely resulted in mechanical turbulence and strong downdrafts along the flight route, and it is likely that the weather conditions affected the gyroplane's ability to achieve a positive climb rate. Given the weather conditions and the gyroplane's maximum operating altitude of 10,000 ft, the pilot demonstrated improper judgment by attempting such a flight. The pilot stated that he could have avoided the accident if he had approached the mountain ridge at a higher altitude. The accident site was inaccessible to first responders, which resulted in the pilot's blood being drawn about 5 hours following the accident. Toxicological testing revealed strong evidence that he had used marijuana at some point before the accident. Although he had no significant active drug (tetrahydrocannabinol [THC]) in his blood at the time it was drawn, it could not be determined how much THC was in this blood at the time of the accident. Therefore, it could not be determined if impairment due to marijuana use contributed to the pilot's poor decision-making.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Turbulence encounter during enroute (cruise) defining event
  2. Loss of lift during enroute (cruise)
  3. Off-field or emergency landing during emergency descent
  4. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during landing (flare/touchdown)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Altitude › Not attained/maintained
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Aircraft capability › Climb capability › Attain/maintain not possible
  • cause Environmental issues › Physical environment › Terrain › Mountainous/hilly terrain › Effect on operation
  • cause Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Turbulence › Terrain induced turbulence › Effect on operation
  • Personnel issues › Physical › Health/Fitness › Use of medication/drugs › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: rotorcraft: gyroplane
  • Flight time: 285 hours in all; 235 in this make and model; 120 in the last 90 days; 60 in the last 30 days; 215 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: January 25, 2016
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: frt
  • Injury: serious injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 350 hours
  • Last inspection: condition inspection, May 20, 2016; 25 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,256 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Rotax 914 (piston); 225 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: U69 Duchesne UT at 4:30 pm
  • Destination: U77 Spanish Fork UT
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 170° at 20 knots, gusting 25
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: a few clouds at 7,000 ft
  • Temperature: 64°F (18°C), dew point 34°F (1°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.81 inHg
  • Observation at 4:53 pm from KPUC, 33 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Other NTSB records under N50NE the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

2015-01-06CEN15CA128 · accident near Grand Junction, CO · substantial damage · serious injuries

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.