The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB GAA16CA379 · Final report

Amateur-built CH-801 accident near Beaumont, Kansas, July 16, 2016

On July 16, 2016 at about 5:30 pm local time, a 2013 amateur-built CH-801, registered N801G, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing (flare/touchdown) near Beaumont, Kansas (Beaumont Hotel airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person had minor injuries; 1 other was unhurt. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's incorrect pitch control during the landing flare in gusty crosswind conditions, which resulted in a hard bounced landing and a nose over.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
July 16, 2016 · about 5:30 pm local time
Place
Beaumont, Kansas · Beaumont Hotel · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person had minor injuries; 1 other was unhurt.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Amateur-built CH-801 NO SERIES, built 2013
Registration
N801G · no longer on the register · serial 8-7059
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot of an experimental amateur-built airplane reported that during the landing flare he encountered a wind shift and gust that resulted in a direct crosswind. The pilot further reported that he applied additional rudder to compensate for the wind shift, but the airspeed decayed and the airplane bounced hard on the grass runway. After the bounce, the pilot reported that he continued to apply left rudder to compensate for the wind, but the airplane would not respond. Subsequently, the airplane touched down in a crab configuration, the nose landing gear collapsed, and the airplane nosed over. The vertical stabilizer, firewall, and right wing sustained substantial damage. During a postaccident examination, the pilot reported that the nose landing gear "support bungee" had failed and the nose landing gear strut jammed upward during the hard landing. He further reported that oil residue was found on the inner strands of the bungee. The pilot reported that this bungee had been in service for 21 months with 195 hours and about 400 landings on the part. According to the airplane kit manufacturer, the rudder should still be controllable, even with a failed bungee. However, the manufacturer further reported that if the nose landing gear strut were to become stuck or lodged into place due to a hard landing, the rudder would also become stuck and uncontrollable. The airplane kit manufacturer does not publish service life limitations for bungees. Because the pilot reported not having rudder authority after the first touchdown, it is likely that the nose landing gear support bungee failed during the first hard touchdown, which resulted in the nose landing gear becoming jammed upward at the upper strut limit resulting in the loss of rudder authority.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Other weather encounter during landing (flare/touchdown)
  2. Hard landing during landing (flare/touchdown) defining event
  3. Landing gear collapse during landing (landing roll)
  4. Nose over/nose down during landing (landing roll)
  5. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during landing (landing roll)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Pitch control › Incorrect use/operation
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Landing flare › Incorrect use/operation
  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Landing gear system › Nose/tail landing gear › Capability exceeded
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Wind › Sudden wind shift › Ability to respond/compensate
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Wind › Gusts › Ability to respond/compensate
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Wind › Crosswind › Ability to respond/compensate

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 2,202 hours in all; 159 in this make and model; 21 in the last 90 days; 11 in the last 30 days; 2,040 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: October 28, 2015
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: minor injuries

Passenger

  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 195.6 hours
  • Last inspection: condition inspection, December 5, 2015
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,400 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Superior XP-360 (piston); 390 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: NONE Wichita KS at 4:30 pm
  • Destination: 07S Beaumont KS
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 18, 2,400 ft by 80 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 130° at 8 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 88°F (31°C), dew point 72°F (22°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.00 inHg
  • Observation at 5:35 pm from KEQA, 15 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

5 documents, released by the NTSB on August 24, 2016. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.