The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA24LA337 · Final report

Piper PA-32R-301T accident near North Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, July 30, 2024

On July 30, 2024 at about 1:30 am local time, a 2001 Piper PA-32R-301T, registered N5343C, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing near North Myrtle Beach, South Carolina (Grand Strand airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s failure to use the emergency landing gear extension system, resulting in a gear-up landing. Contributing to the accident was an alternator belt failure.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
July 30, 2024 · about 1:30 am local time
Place
North Myrtle Beach, South Carolina · Grand Strand · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Piper PA-32R-301T, built 2001 · all PA-32R-301Ts on the register
Registration
N5343C · registry record · serial 3257255
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot reported that during a cross-country flight in night, visual meteorological conditions, the airplane’s alternator failed. He described that he misinterpreted the alternator warning light illuminating, and did not realize that the alternator had failed. Some time later the battery failed, resulting in a total loss of electrical power. He recalled making the decision to continue to his originally intended destination because of his familiarity with the airport. As he entered the downwind leg of the traffic pattern at the destination airport, he began his emergency checklists in preparation for landing. While performing the checklists he noticed that the airplane’s speed was too fast, so he attempted to extend the flaps to slow down. Upon activation, he realized they would not function without electrical power. Amid these efforts he continued the emergency checklist, pulling what he thought was the hydraulic system circuit breaker, but what a post-accident inspection revealed to actually be the standby vacuum pump circuit breaker. The pilot reported that he continued setting up the airplane for landing but did extend the landing gear using the emergency gear extension system. The pilot subsequently landed the airplane with the landing gear still up, resulting in substantial damage to the fuselage’s external longerons. A postaccident examination of the airplane revealed that the emergency landing gear extension handle was in the stowed position. The emergency landing gear extension system was functionally tested while the airplane was on jacks and found to function satisfactorily. Once electrical power was restored, the landing gear retraction/extension system operated normally. Additionally, the alternator belt was found broken, which likely resulted in the alternator’s failure during the flight.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Landing gear not configured during landing defining event
  2. Electrical system malf/failure during enroute (cruise)
  3. Abnormal runway contact during landing (landing roll)

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Forgotten action/omission › Pilot
  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Landing gear system › Gear extension and retract sys › Not used/operated
  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Electrical power system › DC generator › alternator › Failure

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 1,365.1 hours in all; 690.5 in this make and model; 2.9 in the last 30 days; 1,365 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: September 22, 2023
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

Passenger

  • Seat: rear
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 2,760 hours
  • Last inspection: continuous airworthiness programme, September 21, 2023; 58 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 3,600 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Lycoming TIO-540-AH1A (piston); 2,760 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: 0A7 Hendersonville NC at 1:00 am
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 23, 5,997 ft by 100 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: night
  • Wind: from 210° at 9 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 5,500 ft
  • Temperature: 81°F (27°C), dew point 68°F (20°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.04 inHg
  • Observation at 10:53 pm from CRE

Weather report (METAR): KCRE 300253Z AUTO 21009KT 10SM OVC055 27/20 A3004 RMK AO1 SLP172 T02670200 51008

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Photographs from the investigation 4 pictures from the NTSB's docket, as the NTSB released them

The NTSB's photographs with the NTSB's captions, at screen size. Open a picture to see it full size or to report one that should not be shown.

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

4 documents, released by the NTSB on September 4, 2024. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.