Cessna 150 accident near Hohenwald, Tennessee, January 10, 2024
On January 10, 2024 at about 2:15 pm local time, a 1974 Cessna 150, registered N7UT, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute near Hohenwald, Tennessee (Paul Bridges Fld airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The pilot’s failure to use carburetor heat in conditions conducive to the formation of carburetor ice, which resulted in a partial loss of engine power due to fuel starvation. Contributing to the outcome was her failure to attain a proper touchdown point during the subsequent diversionary landing, which resulted in a runway excursion.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- January 10, 2024 · about 2:15 pm local time
- Place
- Hohenwald, Tennessee · Paul Bridges Fld · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Cessna 150 M, built 1974 · all 150s on the register
- Registration
- N7UT · registry record · serial 15076100
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The student pilot was on a solo cross-country flight when the accident occurred. She noticed no irregularities during the preflight inspection, engine run-up, or climb out. About 80 nautical miles (nm) into the flight, while operating at 2,500 ft mean sea level, the engine began to run rough. The pilot moved the throttle and mixture to full, but the engine continued to progressively operate rougher with a subsequent decrease in engine rpm. Unable to maintain altitude, the pilot diverted to the nearest airport. While on final approach, the airplane was high and fast, and she did not believe there was enough altitude to complete a 180° turn to bleed off airspeed, so she continued the approach. The airplane landed long down the runway, exited the paved surface, and collided with a fence resulting in substantial damage to the wings and elevator. Postaccident examination and a test run of the engine did not reveal evidence of any preexisting anomalies or failures that would have prevented normal operation. The recorded temperature and dew point near the accident site were conducive to “serious icing” at cruise engine power settings. The pilot described the troubleshooting tasks she performed while trying to diagnose the reason for the loss of engine power, but did not report using carburetor heat. Based on this information, carburetor ice likely formed during the cruise portion of the flight, which resulted in a partial loss of engine power and a forced landing. During the approach, the pilot was high, fast, and landed long resulting in a runway excursion.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Runway excursion during landing (landing roll)
- Fuel related during enroute defining event
The NTSB's findings
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of equip/system › Pilot
- Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Temp/humidity/pressure › Conducive to carburetor icing › Effect on equipment
- Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Descent/approach/glide path › Not attained/maintained
Pilot
- Certificate: student
- Flight time: 50 hours in all; 39 in this make and model; 47.7 in the last 90 days; 31.2 in the last 30 days; 8.1 as pilot in command; 0 on instruments
- Medical certificate: Class 3 (without waivers/limitations)
- Seat: left
- Injury: no injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 6,037 hours
- Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, November 12, 2023; 81 hours since
- Maximum gross weight: 1,600 lb
- Seats: 2
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Continental O-200-A (piston); 6,037 hours total
- Operator: Volunteer Aviation Foundation INC
The flight
- Departed from: THA Tullahoma TN at 1:05 pm
- Flight plan: VFR
- Runway 02/2, 4,001 ft by 75 ft
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 250° at 7 knots
- Sky: overcast at 2,300 ft
- Temperature: 36°F (2°C), dew point 28°F (-2°C)
- Altimeter: 29.84 inHg
- Observation at 7:55 am from LUG, 32 miles away
Weather report (METAR): METAR KLUG 101355Z AUTO 24010KT 10SM OVC024 02/M02 A2984 RMK A01=
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
6 documents, released by the NTSB on March 19, 2025. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 | PDF, 7 pages | View Download |
| 2 | Pilot's Report | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 3 | Memorandum for Record - FAA Inspector's Statement | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 4 | Carburetor Icing Chart | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 5 | Investigation Photographs | PDF, 5 pages | View Download |
| 6 | Video of Engine Run | 3GP file | Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Other NTSB records under N7UT the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
