The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA24LA006 · Final report

Piper PA28 accident near Jonesboro, Georgia, October 11, 2023

On October 11, 2023 at about 2:30 am local time, a 1973 Piper PA28, registered N55162, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (cruise) near Jonesboro, Georgia. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were seriously injured. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

Both pilots’ inadequate preflight inspection and inadequate fuel monitoring during the flight, which resulted in a total loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
October 11, 2023 · about 2:30 am local time
Place
Jonesboro, Georgia · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people were seriously injured.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Piper PA28 140, built 1973 · all PA28s on the register
Registration
N55162 · no longer on the register · serial 28-7325315
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

Both pilots reported that they were sharing flying responsibilities during the night cross-country flights to build flight time. The pilot in the left seat was performing the takeoffs and landings, while the pilot in the right seat flew the en route portion of the flights. Before departing on the accident flight, the pilots added 15 gallons of fuel, which brought the right fuel tank to full and the left fuel tank to about half to three-fourths full. The pilot in the left seat departed with the fuel selector position to the left tank (the fuel selector handle was located on the left side of the cockpit). As they neared the destination airport of the planned 1 hour 47-minute flight, the pilot in the left seat switched the fuel selector from left tank to right tank. At that time, the left fuel tank would have been nearly empty after departing with that tank half full and drawing from it for the entire accident flight. Shortly thereafter, the engine lost all power. She performed the emergency checklist items but was unable to restart the engine while the pilot in the right seat continued flying the airplane. The airplane was unable to glide to the nearest airport and they performed a forced landing into trees. Examination of the wreckage revealed that it came to rest nose-down in a wooded area. Both wing fuel tanks were breached and there was no fuel odor or browning of vegetation at the accident site. The left-wing fuel cap remained secured; however, the right-wing fuel cap was missing and was not located at the accident site. Based on this information, it is likely that the right-wing fuel cap was not secured before departure and, during the accident flight, fuel siphoned from the right tank without either pilot noticing. The loose or missing right fuel cap was not identified during the preflight inspection of the airplane nor was the resulting fuel imbalance identified during the flight.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Fuel exhaustion during enroute (cruise) defining event
  2. Off-field or emergency landing during emergency descent
  3. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during landing
  4. Aircraft inspection event during prior to flight

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Inspection › Preflight inspection › Flight crew
  • Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Monitoring equip/instruments › Flight crew
  • Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Fuel › Fluid level

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 1,267 hours in all; 600 in this make and model
  • Last flight review: June 5, 2023
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: serious injuries

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 510 hours in all; 60 in this make and model
  • Last flight review: December 10, 2020
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: serious injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 5,433 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, October 17, 2022; 522 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,150 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-320-E3D (piston); 3,943 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: DTS Destin FL
  • Destination: ATL Atlanta GA
  • Flight plan: none
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: night
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: broken clouds at 7,500 ft
  • Temperature: 61°F (16°C), dew point 55°F (13°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.94 inHg
  • Observation at 10:35 pm from HMP, 5 miles away

Weather report (METAR): KHMP 110235Z AUTO 00000KT 10SM BKN075 16/13 A2994

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew2

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

11 documents, released by the NTSB on July 24, 2024. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.