The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB DCA18CA251 · Final report

Mcdonnell Douglas MD88 accident near Charlotte, North Carolina, July 23, 2018

On July 23, 2018 at about 7:38 pm local time, a 1993 Mcdonnell Douglas MD88, registered N918DE, was involved in an accident during enroute (descent) near Charlotte, North Carolina. It was flown under scheduled airline rules (Part 121). 1 person was seriously injured and 1 person had minor injuries; 144 others were unhurt. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

An inadvertent encounter with convective turbulence.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
July 23, 2018 · about 7:38 pm local time
Place
Charlotte, North Carolina · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was seriously injured and 1 person had minor injuries; 144 others were unhurt.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Mcdonnell Douglas MD88 88, built 1993
Registration
N918DE · no longer on the register · serial 49959
Damage
Not recorded
Flight
Flight · scheduled airline rules (Part 121)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

On July 23, 2018, about 1538 eastern daylight time, Delta Air Lines flight 2133, a McDonnell Douglas MD-88, N918DE, encountered turbulence during descent into Charlotte Douglas International Airport (KCLT), Charlotte, North Carolina. Of the 146 passengers and crew onboard, one flight attendant received serious injuries and one received minor injuries. The airplane was not damaged. The regularly scheduled domestic passenger flight was operated under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 121 from Atlanta-Hartsfield International Airport (KATL), Atlanta, Georgia, to KCLT. The captain was the pilot monitoring and first officer was the pilot flying. According to the flight crew, there were thunderstorms along the entire route that required them to deviate around multiple cells. The seat belt sign was on the entire flight and the weather radar was on. As the flight approached KCLT, the captain called the lead flight attendant (FA) and requested that the FAs complete their final walkthrough and be seated for the remainder of the flight, since he expected it to be bumpy during the arrival. As they were deviating around convective weather, the flight entered a cloud and encountered severe turbulence with heavy rain. The autopilot disconnected and the airplane dropped abruptly to the left. The first officer maintained positive manual control throughout the event and the crew estimated the turbulence lasted about 10 seconds. The captain immediately contacted the cabin and was informed that two FAs were injured. After receiving the captain’s call to prepare for landing early, the three FAs immediately began their final walkthroughs. Two FAs were in the aisle when the turbulence occurred. Both FAs were thrown into the air and then onto the floor. One FA had injured her back and was helped into a passenger seat for the remainder of the flight. The other FA injured her knees but was able to continue her duties for the remainder of the flight. The captain declared a medical emergency and requested that emergency personnel meet the airplane at the gate. Upon arrival, both FAs were transported to the hospital where one was diagnosed with a fractured vertebrae.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Turbulence encounter during enroute (descent) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Turbulence › Convective turbulence › Effect on personnel

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 2,701 hours in all; 2,701 in this make and model; 181 in the last 90 days
  • Last flight review: January 9, 2018
  • Medical certificate: Class 1
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

Co-pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 230 hours in all; 230 in this make and model; 165 in the last 90 days
  • Last flight review: March 16, 2018
  • Medical certificate: Class 1
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 76,668 hours
  • Last inspection: continuous airworthiness programme, July 7, 2018
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: Pratt & Whitney JT8D-219 (turbofan); 0 hours total
  • Engine 2: Pratt & Whitney JT8D-219 (turbofan); 0 hours total
  • Operator: Delta Air Lines

The flight

  • Departed from: KATL Atlanta GA at 6:25 pm
  • Destination: KCLT Charlotte NC
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Visibility: 9 statute miles
  • Sky: broken clouds at 3,000 ft
  • Temperature: 82°F (28°C), dew point 72°F (22°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.85 inHg
  • Observation at 7:32 pm from CLT

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Cabi112
Flight crew2
Passengers140

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

6 documents, released by the NTSB on July 13, 2021. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.