The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB DCA12IA114 · Final report

Boeing 787 incident near Charleston, South Carolina, July 28, 2012

On July 28, 2012 at about 8:00 pm local time, a Boeing 787, registered VTANJ, suffered minor damage in an incident during taxi near Charleston, South Carolina (Charelston Afb / International airport). It was a flight test under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 5 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The separation of the fan mid shaft resulted from environmentally assisted cracking under static load. Contributing to the incident was the combination of dry film lubricant applied to the fan mid-shaft and graphite grease used during assembly which made the fan mid-shaft susceptible to corrosion from trapped moisture, and the failure of the engine manufacturer to identify this vulnerability during design/development.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
July 28, 2012 · about 8:00 pm local time
Place
Charleston, South Carolina · Charelston Afb / International · map
Type
Incident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 5 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Boeing 787 8 · all 787s on the register
Registration
VTANJ · no longer on the register · serial 36281
Damage
Minor damage
Flight
Flight test · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

During a taxi test with no intention for flight, as the airplane was approaching 40 knots speed and prior to the engine N1 accelerating beyond 70%, the right engine N1 began to rollback and an EICAS advisory message was displayed indicating an N2 (high pressure rotor speed) exceedance. The flight crew reduced engine power to idle thrust, concluded the taxi test, and shut down the right engine during taxi back to the ramp. Examination of the right engine revealed extensive damage to the low pressure turbine (LPT). The fan mid shaft (FMS) retaining nut was still connected to the FMS threads but the forward part of the FMS, from the rear of the forward threads, was separated from the remainder of the FMS. Separation of the rotating LPT section from the fan, allowed the LPT section to translate rearward resulting in extensive secondary engine damage. Examination confirmed separation of the FMS adjacent to the lock nut face located at the aft most full thread root. The fracture exhibited features indicative of multiple failure modes: one progressive, and one instantaneous. About 85 percent of the fracture surface exhibited features consistent with progressive fracture. The remaining fracture surface showed signs consistent with instantaneous failure by overstress. Further examination revealed features consistent with environmentally assisted cracking (EAC) specific to GE 1014 ultrahigh strength steel. The FMS threads and the retaining nut were coated with a dry film lubricant, and grease or engine oil was used as an assembly aid. Although a lead based dry film lubricant was previously used on GE engine fan mid shafts, during development of the GEnx engine, the design was changed to incorporate a lead free dry film lubricant, and graphite grease instead of the previously used engine oil as an assembly aid. Testing of specimens taken from the FMS, and comparison to other dry film lubricants used previously on GE 1014 ultrahigh strength steel indicated that the dry film lubricant used on the incident FMS absorbed moisture at a higher rate. Additionally, the combination of dry film lubricant and graphite assembly grease was shown to increase the corrosion rate of GE 1014. Following the FMS separation that occurred during this taxi test, GE developed an ultrasonic inspection to scan the forward end of the FMS in the area of the threads where the fracture occurred. While conducting the inspections, a GEnx-1B engine installed on another airplane was found to have an indication of a similar crack on the FMS. This airplane had not yet been operated in flight. Follow up testing indicated the crack exhibited features consistent with progressive environmentally assisted cracking.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Powerplant sys/comp malf/fail during taxi defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine (turbine/turboprop) › Reduction gear and shaft › Fatigue/wear/corrosion
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine (turbine/turboprop) › Reduction gear and shaft › Design
  • factor Organizational issues › Development › Design › Equipment design › Manufacturer

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane; rotorcraft: glider
  • Flight time: 12,500 hours in all; 174 in this make and model
  • Last flight review: May 11, 2012
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 6,700 hours in all; 44 in this make and model
  • Last flight review: February 23, 2012
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 0 hours
  • Maximum gross weight: 503,500 lb
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: General Electric GEnx-1B67 (turbofan); 0 hours total
  • Engine 2: General Electric GEnx-1B67 (turbofan); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: KCHS Charleston SC
  • Destination: KCHS Charleston SC
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 21, 7,000 ft by 150 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 220° at 12 knots, gusting 19
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: a few clouds at 3,000 ft
  • Temperature: 91°F (33°C), dew point 77°F (25°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.95 inHg
  • Observation at 7:56 pm from KCHS

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew5

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

12 documents, released by the NTSB on September 14, 2015. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.