Cessna 177RG accident near Galt, Missouri, February 8, 2021
On February 8, 2021 at about 8:42 pm local time, a 1971 Cessna 177RG, registered N8080G, was destroyed in an accident during enroute near Galt, Missouri. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were killed. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The pilot’s decision to takeoff into instrument meteorological conditions consisting of low ceilings and icing and his failure to remain clear of terrain while attempting to remain below the clouds, which resulted in impact with terrain.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- February 8, 2021 · about 8:42 pm local time
- Place
- Galt, Missouri · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 2 people were killed.
- Weather
- instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
- Aircraft
- Cessna 177RG, built 1971 · all 177RGs on the register
- Registration
- N8080G · no longer on the register · serial 177RG0080
- Damage
- Destroyed
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The instrument-rated pilot completed one leg of a cross-country flight and landed with ¼ inch of structural icing on the airplane. After placing the airplane in a hanger to deice, the pilot elected to depart into similar weather conditions as when he arrived, which consisted of low cloud ceilings and forecast icing in the clouds. Before departing, the pilot told a witness he intended to fly north then west because “the weather was better to the north.” The witness attempted to dissuade the pilot from departing, but the pilot elected to takeoff anyway. No evidence was found that the pilot obtained a weather briefing or used his Foreflight account to check enroute weather conditions, but he did show a witness a weather map on his phone prior to departing. The pilot departed and flew north-northwest about 70 miles before turning to the west-southwest until the data ended near the accident site. The airplane attained a maximum altitude of 1,900 ft mean sea level (msl) before it began a gradual descent until the data ended at 1,200 ft msl. Terrain along the route of flight varied between about 750 ft and 950 ft msl and the elevation at the accident site was about 785 ft msl. The pilot was not in contact with air traffic control during the flight. The airplane impacted a wooded area about 1.8 miles west of the last recorded flight data point. The initial impact occurred with trees about 30 ft above the ground. The airplane was accounted for in its entirety at the accident site. Damage and dispersion of the wreckage prevented determination of the airplane’s attitude at the time of impact. The wreckage was examined, and no pre-impact anomalies were noted that would have prevented normal operation of the airplane. Although there was no record of the pilot checking weather for the flight, his decision to fly north before turning west suggests that he likely checked weather from an undiscovered source. The airplane’s flight track is consistent with the pilot attempting to remain below the clouds, and it is likely that the airplane’s gradual descent corresponded to lowering cloud bases as the flight progressed.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- VFR encounter with IMC during enroute defining event
- Miscellaneous/other during prior to flight
- Controlled flight into terrain or object (CFIT) during enroute
The NTSB's findings
- Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
- Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Low ceiling › Response/compensation
- Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Low visibility › Response/compensation
- Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Altitude › Not attained/maintained
- Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › Tree(s) › Contributed to outcome
Pilot
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 2,109 hours in all
- Medical certificate: Class 3
- Seat: left
- Injury: fatal
The aircraft
- Last inspection: inspection type not recorded
- Maximum gross weight: 2,800 lb
- Seats: 4
- Landing gear: retractable
- Engine: Lycoming IO-360-A1B6D (piston); 0 hours total
- Operator: Aircraft Partners LLC
The flight
- Departed from: MBY Moberly MO at 8:10 pm
- Flight plan: none
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 020° at 11 knots
- Visibility: 1.2 statute miles
- Temperature: 7°F (-14°C), dew point 1°F (-17°C)
- Altimeter: 30.21 inHg
- Observation at 2:55 pm from KIRK, 38 miles away
Weather report (METAR): KIRK 082055Z AUTO 02011KT 1 1/4SM HZ FEW015 BKN020 OVC028 M14/M17 A3021 RMK AO2 SLP257 I1001 I3001 T11391167 56016
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 | |||
| Passengers | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
12 documents, released by the NTSB on April 21, 2022. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Witness Statements | PDF, 11 pages | View Download |
| 2 | Flight Tracks | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 3 | Wreckage Examination Memorandum | PDF, 3 pages | View Download |
| 4 | Meteorology Specialist Report | PDF, 30 pages | View Download |
| 5 | Engine Data Monitor - Specialist's Factual Report _CEN21FA125 | PDF, 6 pages | View Download |
| 6 | Attachment 1 to Engine Data Monitor - Specialist's Factual REPORT_CEN21FA125 | data file | Download |
| 7 | Attachment 2 to Engine Data Monitor - Specialist's Factual REPORT_CEN21FA125 | data file | Download |
| 8 | Electronic Flight Instrument System - Specialist's Factual REPORT_CEN21FA125 | PDF, 9 pages | View Download |
| 9 | Attachment 1 to Electronic Flight Instrument System - Specialist's Factual REPORT_CEN21FA125 -- Tabular Data | data file | Download |
| 10 | ADS-B Raw Data | spreadsheet | Download |
| 11 | Photos | PDF, 5 pages | View Download |
| 12 | Autopsy Memo for Record | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
