The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN19LA231 · Final report

Ayres S2R accident near Breckenridge, Michigan, July 21, 2019

On July 21, 2019 at about 11:05 am local time, a 1999 Ayres S2R, registered N766BF, was substantially damaged in an accident during initial climb near Breckenridge, Michigan (Private airport). It was an aerial application (crop spraying) flight under agricultural flying rules (Part 137). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

A total loss of engine power due to a lack of oil in the engine. The source of the inflight oil leak could not be determined based on the available information.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
July 21, 2019 · about 11:05 am local time
Place
Breckenridge, Michigan · Private · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Ayres S2R G10, built 1999
Registration
N766BF · no longer on the register · serial G10-157
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Aerial application (crop spraying) flight · agricultural flying rules (Part 137)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot was departing on an agricultural application flight when after takeoff, about 100 ft above the ground, he observed a sudden increase in exhaust gas temperature (EGT) above the engine’s limitations. The pilot immediately reduced the throttle, but the engine had a total loss of engine power and the pilot made an immediate forced landing in a cornfield. The airplane fuselage and wings were substantially damaged during the forced landing. Data downloaded from the airplane’s engine monitor confirmed there was a sudden and total loss of engine oil pressure that resulted in a loss of control of the propeller blade angle with a corresponding decrease in engine speed and increase of EGT. The decrease in oil pressure was consistent with a low oil supply to the main oil pump. It was reported that engine oil was present in the oil tank, but the oil level was not verified at the accident site. However, a few weeks after the accident, the engine oil tank did not contain any oil when the engine was prepared for shipment. The oil tank was intact and was not breached. Additionally, the oil transfer hoses and fittings associated with the oil cooler were found intact and tight. Postaccident disassembly of the engine did not reveal any evidence of a mechanical malfunction or failure that would have precluded normal operation. Normal oil wetting and wear signatures were observed throughout the engine. The investigation determined that the loss of engine oil was not from the engine. The airframe portion of the engine oil system, consisting of the oil cooler and two transfer flex-hoses, was examined to determine the source of the oil leak. Although there was a weld fracture along the edge of the cooler housing, the fracture location and appearance were consistent with impact-related damage. The weld was repaired and there were no leaks observed with the oil cooler or the two transfer flex-hoses when they were pressurized and submerged in a water tank. A review of photos taken on the day of the accident revealed that there was engine oil present on several components inside the engine nacelle. The internal surface of the eductor mixing duct also was oil wetted, consistent with engine exhaust drawing escaped oil from the nacelle through the annulus and into the mixer duct. The oil cooler was replaced 2 days and 1.74 flight hours before the accident flight. Although an inadequately torqued oil flex-hose fitting likely was the source of the inflight loss of engine oil, the investigation was unable to conclusively support this scenario with the information collected during the investigation.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Off-field or emergency landing during landing
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during landing
  3. Loss of engine power (total) during initial climb defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine (turbine/turboprop) › Oil system › Not specified

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 1,393 hours in all; 317 in this make and model; 104 in the last 90 days; 55 in the last 30 days; 1,356 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: May 24, 2019
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: ctr
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 5,087.1 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, July 19, 2019; 1.7 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 10,500 lb
  • Seats: 1
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Honeywell TPE-331-10-51 (turboprop); 16,859 hours total
  • Operator: Earl'S Spray Service Inc

The flight

  • Departed from: PVT Breckenridge MI at 11:05 am
  • Destination: PVT Breckenridge MI
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 27, 2,500 ft by 90 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 340° at 4 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 70°F (21°C), dew point 68°F (20°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.95 inHg
  • Observation at 10:56 am from AMN, 15 miles away

Weather report (METAR): METAR KAMN 211056Z AUTO 34004KT 10SM CLR 21/20 A2995 RMK AO2 T02050195=

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

10 documents, released by the NTSB on August 23, 2022. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.