The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR26LA065 · Final report

Cessna 150F accident near Temecula, California, December 20, 2025

On December 20, 2025 at about 4:30 am local time, a 1966 Cessna 150F, registered N8155S, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (cruise) near Temecula, California. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s inadequate preflight inspection and fuel planning, which resulted in a total loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
December 20, 2025 · about 4:30 am local time
Place
Temecula, California · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 150F, built 1966 · all 150Fs on the register
Registration
N8155S · registry record · serial 15061755
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot of the airplane reported that he was conducting a round-trip cross-country flight from his home airport to another airport. The pilot departed his home airport with full fuel tanks (26 gallons of fuel, of which 3.5 gallons were unusable) and he estimated it would have provided about 4.5 hours of flight time for the flight. Upon arrival at the destination airport, the pilot observed both fuel gauges at about 3/4 of a tank, he however, did not visually verify or measure the fuel levels in either tank. The pilot initially stated that his flight time on the outbound leg was approximately 2 hours, 10 minutes. However, he later reported that it was about 1.5 hours. He added that during the return portion of the flight at an altitude of about 8,500 ft mean sea level, the airplane encountered stronger-than-anticipated headwinds, that resulted in a reduced ground speed. He added that he also encountered up and down drafts, which resulted in him adding power and enriching the mixture to maintain altitude and airspeed. As the airplane approached the destination airport, the engine began to lose power and subsequently experienced a total loss of engine power. The pilot reported that he was unable to restore engine power and initiated a forced landing on an unlit road. During the landing flare, he realized that the road had turned, and he subsequently landed in a vineyard. The airplane struck multiple metal ground stakes, which resulted in substantial damage to both wing struts and horizontal stabilizers. The pilot added that for fuel planning purposes, he used his prior experience operating the accident airplane to estimate fuel consumption. Recorded ADS-B data for the initial flight spanned about 1 hour, 20 minutes, and started about 1.5 nm south of the departure airport and ended about 9.5 nm west of the destination airport. ADS-B data for the return flight spanned about 2 hours, 10 minutes, and began about 12 nm west of the departure airport and ended about 6 nm east of the accident site. According to the airplane’s cruise performance chart, at a cruise altitude of 7,500 ft and a power setting of 2,700 RPM, and a lean mixture, the airplane’s cruise endurance was approximately 4.1 hours. The chart also noted that the endurance and range calculations did not include allowances for takeoff or fuel reserve. Additionally, the cruise performance chart did not include fuel burn calculations for a climb from takeoff to a cruise altitude, which is however provided in the maximum rate of climb data chart. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed no evidence of any pre-accident mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. The fuel tanks or fuel lines were not breached. The left fuel tank contained about 4 ounces of fuel and the right fuel tank contained about 1/4 gallon of fuel.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Fuel exhaustion during enroute (cruise) defining event
  2. Off-field or emergency landing during landing (flare/touchdown)
  3. Aircraft inspection event during prior to flight

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Planning/preparation › Fuel planning › Pilot
  • Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Fuel › Fluid level
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Inspection › Preflight inspection › Pilot
  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › Pole › Contributed to outcome

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot, military
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 1,607.4 hours in all; 126.9 in this make and model; 56.2 in the last 90 days; 29 in the last 30 days; 118.7 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: July 30, 2025
  • Medical certificate: BasicMed (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 4,482.9 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, March 1, 2025; 30.3 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,600 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Continental O-200-A42 (piston); 3,501 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: HII Lake Havasu AZ at 2:06 am
  • Destination: F70 Temecula CA
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: night
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 48°F (9°C), dew point 41°F (5°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.06 inHg
  • Observation at 10:35 pm from KHMT, 10 miles away

Weather report (METAR): METAR KHMT 200635Z AUTO 00000KT 10SM CLR 09/05 A3006 RMK AO2

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The NTSB has not released the docket for this case yet. The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), is usually released when the investigation is nearly complete, and the list here is refreshed when it appears. Check at the NTSB.

Other NTSB records under N8155S the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

1995-06-30FTW95LA276 · accident near Garfield, CO · substantial damage · no injuries

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.