The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR17LA174 · Final report

Rockwell International S 2R accident near Brawley, California, August 1, 2017

On August 1, 2017 at about 1:55 pm local time, a 1974 Rockwell International S 2R, registered N4913X, was substantially damaged in an accident during maneuvering (low-alt flying) near Brawley, California. It was an aerial application (crop spraying) flight under agricultural flying rules (Part 137). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The partial loss of engine power due to the overstress separation of three supercharger drive gear teeth.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
August 1, 2017 · about 1:55 pm local time
Place
Brawley, California · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Rockwell International S 2R UNDESIGNAT, built 1974 · all S 2Rs on the register
Registration
N4913X · no longer on the register · serial 2104R
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Aerial application (crop spraying) flight · agricultural flying rules (Part 137)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The commercial pilot reported that, while conducting low-level maneuvering over a field during the agricultural application flight, the engine lost partial power . The pilot leveled the wings, and the engine momentarily regained some power; however, shortly after, it started to lose power again. The pilot subsequently initiated an off-airport landing to a field. During the landing roll, the propeller struck the ground, and the landing gear were torn off. Both wings, the engine mounts, and the bottom of the fuselage sustained substantial damage. Postaccident examination of the engine revealed that three of the supercharger drive gear teeth had broken, one of which was found in the engine oil sump. Examination of the gear teeth fracture surfaces revealed features and topographies consistent with bending overstress separations. Contact patterns and pitting were noted on the pressure faces of the remaining intact gear teeth, which were indicative of heavy loading. No preexisting cracks were found. The thrust bearing exhibited damage consistent with a propeller strike. A representative from an engine overhaul facility that overhauls the accident engine make and model (but did not overhaul the accident engine) reported that it is unlikely that the gear teeth fractured during the accident sequence given that one of the separated gear teeth was found in the oil sump and not in the supercharger blower section because typically when a gear tooth separates during flight, the oil flow will carry the broken fragment down into the sump. The representative reported that the gear teeth usually break due to either a sudden engine stoppage or fatigue or stress cracking. The fatigue or stress cracking can often be the result of a propeller strike and, if left unchecked, can result in the eventual separation of the affected gear teeth. He stated that it is possible for an engine to continue operating relatively normally with only one gear tooth missing; however, multiple broken gear teeth would result in a decrease in power of the supercharger section. Maintenance records were not made available for review during the investigation; therefore, it could not be determined if a propeller strike or sudden engine stoppage was reported before the accident.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Powerplant sys/comp malf/fail during maneuvering (low-alt flying) defining event
  2. Loss of engine power (partial) during maneuvering (low-alt flying)
  3. Off-field or emergency landing during landing
  4. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during landing (landing roll)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › (general) › (general) › Failure

Pilot

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 2,400 hours in all; 500 in this make and model; 60 in the last 90 days; 24 in the last 30 days; 2,280 as pilot in command; 960 on instruments
  • Last flight review: April 20, 2017
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: sngl
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 6,615 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, November 16, 2016
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Pratt & Whitney R-1340- AN1 (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: Brawley CA at 1:45 pm
  • Destination: Brawley CA
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 050° at 5 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 88°F (31°C), dew point 73°F (23°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.78 inHg
  • Observation at 1:53 pm from KIPL, 14 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

6 documents, released by the NTSB on February 28, 2019. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Other NTSB records under N4913X the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

1984-06-16MKC84LA180 · accident near Pocahontas, AR · substantial damage · no injuries

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.