The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR14FA302 · Final report

Cessna 172K accident near Littlefield, Arizona, July 21, 2014

On July 21, 2014 at about 1:30 am local time, a 1969 Cessna 172K, registered N84754, was destroyed in an accident during maneuvering (low-alt flying) near Littlefield, Arizona. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's failure to maintain airplane control when the airplane encountered high gusting wind while conducting low altitude flight in a narrow canyon, which resulted in an inflight collision with terrain.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
July 21, 2014 · about 1:30 am local time
Place
Littlefield, Arizona · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people were killed.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 172K P, built 1969 · all 172Ks on the register
Registration
N84754 · no longer on the register · serial 17258603
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The newly certificated private pilot and his passenger, who was the pilot's brother, were making a personal cross-country flight in a rented airplane. The pilot's parents were making the trip along the same route via automobile and were expecting to meet their sons at the destination. The group was communicating via cell phone and text messaging. The parents, who were ahead of the flight, received a message that, due to wind, the airplane had landed. Although the parents offered to drive back and pick up their sons, the pilot asked that they wait and see if the wind abated. A short time later, the pilot reported that the wind had abated and that he was en route to the destination.  Along the route to the destination, the highway that the pilot was following passed through a narrow, winding, steep-walled river canyon. A motorist reported seeing the airplane low overhead in the canyon following the highway. As the airplane approached the southwest (exit) end of the canyon, the witness saw the airplane make an abrupt left roll to an inverted position and impact a steep canyon wall. Examination of the accident site indicated that the airplane impacted the canyon wall about 100 ft above the level of the highway. Postaccident examination of the airplane confirmed flight control continuity, and signs consistent with the engine producing power at the time of impact were noted. No mechanical anomalies were found. The closest weather station, located about 20 miles from the accident site, reported that, near the time of the accident, the wind varied between 200º and 240º at 9 to 17 knots gusting to 27 knots with a peak gust of 31 knots reported about 15 minutes before the accident. It is likely that, as the airplane neared the canyon exit, it encountered high winds entering the narrow canyon from the desert, which rolled the airplane to the left and inverted as the pilot was turning left to follow the highway. Because the pilot was operating the airplane at low altitude and in close proximity to terrain, he was unable to recover before the airplane impacted the canyon wall.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control in flight during maneuvering (low-alt flying) defining event
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during maneuvering (low-alt flying)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Wind › Gusts › Ability to respond/compensate
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Lateral/bank control › Not attained/maintained
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Altitude › Not attained/maintained
  • Personnel issues › Experience/knowledge › Experience/qualifications › Total experience › Pilot
  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Physical environment › Terrain › Mountainous/hilly terrain › Effect on operation

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 100 hours in all; 10 in this make and model
  • Last flight review: May 21, 2014
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: fatal

Passenger

  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 11,507 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, July 16, 2014
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,299 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-320 SERIES (piston); 3,690 hours total
  • Fire on the ground

The flight

  • Departed from: U52 Beaver UT at 11:30 pm
  • Destination: 67L Mesquite NV
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 240° at 18 knots, gusting 24
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 100°F (38°C), dew point 37°F (3°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.92 inHg
  • Observation at 1:15 am from UTI, 28 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.