The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR09CA188 · Final report

Hiller Sixchuter Legend XL accident near Vancouver, Washington, April 8, 2009

On April 8, 2009 at about 1:09 am local time, a Hiller Sixchuter Legend XL (powered parachute), registered N16503, suffered minor damage in an accident during takeoff near Vancouver, Washington. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was seriously injured and 1 person had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's failure to attain/maintain adequate airspeed to become airborne within the distance available for takeoff.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
April 8, 2009 · about 1:09 am local time
Place
Vancouver, Washington · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was seriously injured and 1 person had minor injuries.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Hiller Sixchuter Legend XL
Registration
N16503 · no longer on the register · serial 3018
Damage
Minor damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The student pilot attempted a takeoff in his experimental light sport aircraft (powered parachute). On previous occasions, he had successfully become airborne from his backyard. The pilot indicated that during acceleration he was unable to gain adequate lift due to the "stagnant air condition." There was little or no wind and the airplane was carrying a passenger. The powered parachute impacted a garage. The student pilot further reported that he was working on obtaining a sport pilot certificate. The pilot reported that he experienced no preimpact mechanical malfunction with the aircraft.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Collision during takeoff/land during takeoff defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › Residence/building › Contributed to outcome
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Airspeed › Not attained/maintained
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot

Dual student

  • Certificate: student
  • Flight time: 75 hours in all; 25 in this make and model
  • Medical certificate: None
  • Seat: unk
  • Injury: serious injuries

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: inspection type not recorded
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Rotax 582 (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: Vancouver WA at 1:09 am
  • Destination: Vancouver WA
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 0°F (-18°C), dew point 0°F (-18°C)

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Other NTSB records under N16503 the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

2000-10-30LAX01LA029 · accident near Gorman, CA · substantial damage · fatal

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.