The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB GAA19CA203 · Final report

Cessna 172 accident near Fullteron, California, April 11, 2019

On April 11, 2019 at about 6:30 pm local time, a 1986 Cessna 172, registered N9964L, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing (landing roll) near Fullteron, California (Fullerton Muni airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The student pilot's failure to maintain directional control during the landing roll, which resulted in a runway excursion and nose-over.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
April 11, 2019 · about 6:30 pm local time
Place
Fullteron, California · Fullerton Muni · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 172 P, built 1986 · all 172s on the register
Registration
N9964L · registry record · serial 17276652
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The student pilot reported that, during the landing roll, he applied brakes, but the airplane began to veer left. He corrected with right rudder, but the airplane exited the runway to the left and nosed over. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the left wing and rudder. The student reported that there were no preimpact mechanical failures or malfunctions with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control on ground during landing (landing roll) defining event
  2. Attempted remediation/recovery during landing (landing roll)
  3. Runway excursion during landing (landing roll)
  4. Nose over/nose down during landing (landing roll)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Directional control › Not attained/maintained
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of equip/system › Student/instructed pilot

Dual student

  • Certificate: student
  • Flight time: 142 hours in all; 60 in this make and model; 11.5 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: April 8, 2019
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,400 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-320 SERIES (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: FUL Fullteron CA at 6:00 pm
  • Destination: FUL Fullteron CA
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 24, 3,121 ft by 75 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 220° at 5 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 72°F (22°C), dew point 46°F (8°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.00 inHg
  • Observation at 6:53 pm from KFUL

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Other NTSB records under N9964L the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

1996-03-30LAX96LA148 · accident near Fullerton, CA · substantial damage · no injuries

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.