The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB GAA19CA068 · Final report

Amateur-built SONEX and Cessna 172 accident near Corona, California, November 19, 2018

On November 19, 2018 at about 9:50 pm local time, 2 aircraft, amateur-built SONEX (N322JS) and Cessna 172 (N4240L), were involved in the same accident near Corona, California (Corona Muni airport). No one was hurt; 4 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s failure to see and avoid the airplane on the runway while landing and the pilot receiving instruction’s and flight instructor's failure to properly scan the approach before pulling onto the runway during takeoff.
The pilot’s failure to see and avoid the airplane on the runway while landing and the pilot receiving instruction’s and flight instructor's failure to properly scan the approach before pulling onto the runway during the takeoff.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
November 19, 2018 · about 9:50 pm local time
Place
Corona, California · Corona Muni · map
Type
Accident · collision on the ground
Injuries
No one was hurt; 4 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft 1
Amateur-built SONEX, built 2004
Registration
N322JS · registry record · serial 0322
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
Aircraft 2
Cessna 172 G, built 1966 · all 172s on the register
Registration
N4240L · no longer on the register · serial 17254309
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative for the amateur-built SONEX final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot in the low-wing airplane reported that, while in the traffic pattern at the nontowered airport, he made continuous reports on the common traffic advisory frequency (CTAF). He added that, on final, he observed a high-wing airplane positioned adjacent to the runway he was approaching. He added that, on short final, "the runway was clear," and he heard no radio transmissions. The low-wing airplane impacted the high-wing airplane on the runway. The low-wing airplane yawed right and came to rest nose down in front of the right wing of the high-wing airplane. The pilot receiving instruction in the high-wing airplane reported that, after performing a run-up, she and the flight instructor taxied to and held short of the departure runway. She added that, during the taxi, she and the instructor did not hear radio transmissions on the CTAF from other aircraft in the traffic pattern. Before departure, they visually cleared final and base and reported their departure intentions on the CTAF. They lined up on the runway for a short-field takeoff, held the brakes, and applied full power. She released the brakes and about 3 to 5 seconds into the takeoff roll, they heard a loud noise, and the airplane was pushed left. Despite reporting not hearing the other pilots on the CTAF, all the pilots reported that they used the same frequency. The low-wing airplane sustained substantial damage to the left wing. The high-wing airplane sustained substantial damage to the right wing and empennage. Two witnesses in the other airplane reported that, while taxiing, they heard the pilots in the high-wing airplane transmit that they were "taking the runway" and departing. They observed the high-wing airplane line up on the runway but did not see any aircraft on base or final. Several moments later, they looked back and saw the high-wing airplane still on the runway and the low-wing airplane on final. One of the witnesses made a call on the CTAF warning the low-wing airplane pilot that another airplane was on the runway but heard no response. He made another call to the low-wing airplane pilots to suggest that they perform a go-around, and then they observed the low-wing airplane land on top of the high-wing airplane. The pilots of the low- and high-wing airplanes reported that there were no preaccident mechanical failures or malfunctions with their airplanes that would have precluded normal operation.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The NTSB's narrative for the Cessna 172 final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot in the low-wing airplane reported that, while in the traffic pattern at the nontowered airport, he made continuous reports on the common traffic advisory frequency (CTAF). He added that, on final, he observed a high-wing airplane positioned adjacent to the runway he was approaching. He added that, on short final, "the runway was clear," and he heard no radio transmissions. The low-wing airplane impacted the high-wing airplane on the runway. The low-wing airplane yawed right and came to rest nose down in front of the right wing of the high-wing airplane. The pilot receiving instruction in the high-wing airplane reported that, after performing a run-up, she and the flight instructor taxied to and held short of the departure runway. She added that, during the taxi, she and the instructor did not hear radio transmissions on the CTAF from other aircraft in the traffic pattern. Before departure, they visually cleared final and base and reported their departure intentions on the CTAF. They lined up on the runway for a short-field takeoff, held the brakes, and applied full power. She released the brakes and about 3 to 5 seconds into the takeoff roll, they heard a loud noise, and the airplane was pushed left. Despite reporting not hearing the other pilots on the CTAF, all the pilots reported that they used the same frequency. The low-wing airplane sustained substantial damage to the left wing. The high-wing airplane sustained substantial damage to the right wing and empennage. Two witnesses in the other airplane reported that, while taxiing, they heard the pilots in the high-wing airplane transmit that they were "taking the runway" and departing. They observed the high-wing airplane line up on the runway but did not see any aircraft on base or final. Several moments later, they looked back and saw the high-wing airplane still on the runway and the low-wing airplane on final. One of the witnesses made a call on the CTAF warning the low-wing airplane pilot that another airplane was on the runway but heard no response. He made another call to the low-wing airplane pilots to suggest that they perform a go-around, and then they observed the low-wing airplane land on top of the high-wing airplane. The pilots of the low- and high-wing airplanes reported that there were no preaccident mechanical failures or malfunctions with their airplanes that would have precluded normal operation.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record for the amateur-built SONEX from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Miscellaneous/other during takeoff
  2. Ground collision during landing defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › Aircraft › Effect on operation
  • cause Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Monitoring other aircraft › Pilot
  • cause Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Monitoring environment › Pilot of other aircraft

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 219 hours in all; 17 in this make and model; 20 in the last 90 days; 1 in the last 30 days; 165 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: September 1, 2018
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 1,139.9 hours
  • Last inspection: condition inspection, September 14, 2018
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,250 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Jabiru 3300A (piston); 1,150 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: AJO Corona CA at 9:43 pm
  • Destination: AJO Corona CA
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 25, 3,200 ft by 60 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 260° at 7 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 72°F (22°C), dew point 45°F (7°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.98 inHg
  • Observation at 9:56 pm from KAJO

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

The factual record for the Cessna 172 from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Miscellaneous/other during takeoff
  2. Ground collision during takeoff defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Monitoring environment › Instructor/check pilot
  • cause Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Monitoring environment › Student/instructed pilot
  • cause Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Monitoring other aircraft › Pilot of other aircraft
  • cause Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › Aircraft › Effect on operation

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 291 hours in all; 33 in this make and model; 20 in the last 90 days; 20 in the last 30 days; 155 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: May 12, 2018
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

Flight instructor

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 1,750 hours in all; 13 in this make and model; 130 in the last 90 days; 50 in the last 30 days; 1,300 as pilot in command; 575 on instruments
  • Last flight review: June 1, 2018
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: inspection type not recorded
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,300 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Continental O-300 SER (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: AJO Corona CA at 9:50 pm
  • Destination: AJO Corona CA
  • Flight plan: not recorded
  • Runway 25, 3,200 ft by 60 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew2

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.