The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB GAA18CA496 · Final report

Cessna A185 accident near Big Lake, Alaska, August 18, 2018

On August 18, 2018 at about 5:30 am local time, a 1978 Cessna A185, registered N185MC, was substantially damaged in an accident during takeoff near Big Lake, Alaska (West Papoose Lake Airpark airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s failure to maintain clearance from tree foliage on the left side of the runway during takeoff due to his focus on the right side of the runway.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
August 18, 2018 · about 5:30 am local time
Place
Big Lake, Alaska · West Papoose Lake Airpark · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna A185 F, built 1978 · all A185s on the register
Registration
N185MC · registry record · serial 18503347
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot reported that, during the takeoff roll to the southeast on a private airstrip, about 120 ft down the runway, the left wing struck some tree foliage. The airplane veered left, exited the runway, and impacted trees. He added that he was watching the right side of the runway for a swale and was not paying attention to the left side of the runway. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the left wing. The pilot reported that there were no preaccident mechanical failures or malfunctions with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Runway excursion during takeoff
  2. Collision during takeoff/land during takeoff defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Monitoring environment › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › Tree(s) › Effect on operation
  • cause Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Attention › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land; single-engine sea
  • Flight time: 3,500 hours in all; 2,900 in this make and model; 60 in the last 90 days
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: unk
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: inspection type not recorded
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Continental IO-520 (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: 44AK Big Lake AK
  • Flight plan: not recorded
  • Runway 11, 1,600 ft by 50 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 7,000 ft
  • Temperature: 55°F (13°C), dew point 48°F (9°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.25 inHg
  • Observation at 5:56 am from PAWS, 13 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.