The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB GAA17CA423 · Final report

Cessna T210L accident near Yuba City, California, July 7, 2017

On July 7, 2017 at about 1:15 am local time, a 1976 Cessna T210L, registered N333GK, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing near Yuba City, California (Sutter County airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s failure to extend the landing gear before landing.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
July 7, 2017 · about 1:15 am local time
Place
Yuba City, California · Sutter County · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna T210L M, built 1976 · all T210Ls on the register
Registration
N333GK · registry record · serial 21061282
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot in the retractable-landing-gear airplane reported that he made a normal approach, but he failed to extend the landing gear. The airplane touched down on the runway and skidded to a stop on the lower fuselage. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the lower fuselage. Per the National Transportation Safety Board Pilot Aircraft Accident Report, the pilot noted that the accident could have been prevented if he had performed a "double and triple check of my GUMPS checklist." The pilot reported that there were no preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Abnormal runway contact during landing
  2. Landing gear not configured during landing defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Forgotten action/omission › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Landing gear system › Gear extension and retract sys › Not used/operated

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 392 hours in all; 27 in this make and model; 0 in the last 90 days; 0 in the last 30 days; 322 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: June 17, 2017
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: annual inspection, August 1, 2016
  • Maximum gross weight: 4,000 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Continental TSIO -520-H (piston); 2,042 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: KRDD Redding CA at 1:15 pm
  • Destination: O52 Yuba City CA
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 17, 3,045 ft by 75 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 230° at 6 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 104°F (40°C), dew point 48°F (9°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.90 inHg

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

2 documents, released by the NTSB on December 1, 2017. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.