The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB GAA16CA453 · Final report

Cessna 150 accident near Franklin, Pennsylvania, August 24, 2016

On August 24, 2016 at about 6:00 pm local time, a 1965 Cessna 150, registered N8120S, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing (aborted after touchdown) near Franklin, Pennsylvania (Venango Rgnl airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The student pilot's failure to maintain pitch control resulting in a hard landing and the flight instructor's delayed action to assist the student pilot during the aborted landing, which resulted in a runway excursion, a right main and nose gear collapse, and fuselage damage.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
August 24, 2016 · about 6:00 pm local time
Place
Franklin, Pennsylvania · Venango Rgnl · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 150 F, built 1965 · all 150s on the register
Registration
N8120S · no longer on the register · serial 15061720
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The student pilot reported that during a gusty crosswind landing the airplane touched down and drifted off the runway to the right. He further reported that he added power to abort the landing, but "with the carburetor heat still on, and the flaps at 30 degrees and the temperature of nearly 80 degrees Fahrenheit outside, we did not regain control." The airplane pitched up and the left wing hit the ground. Subsequently, the airplane was "vaulted" over to the right side of the runway and impacted terrain. which resulted in a collapsed right main and nose gear. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the fuselage. The student pilot reported that there were no preimpact mechanical failures or malfunctions with the airframe or engine that would have precluded normal operation. The flight instructor reported that the student pilot flared a little high and he thought the landing would be "just a little hard" and he allowed the student to continue. The flight instructor further reported that during the aborted landing, he attempted to help the student pilot maintain control of the airplane, but "it was too late". The automated weather observing system at the airport about 5 minutes before the accident recorded the wind at 180 degrees true at 12 knots, gusting to 16 knots. The student pilot reported that the landing was on runway 30. The same automated weather observing system about 15 minutes after the accident recorded the wind at 210 degrees true at 12 knots, gusting to 16 knots.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Miscellaneous/other during landing (aborted after touchdown) defining event
  2. Abnormal runway contact during landing
  3. Runway excursion during landing
  4. Landing gear collapse during landing

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Student/instructed pilot
  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Delayed action › Instructor/check pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Pitch control › Not attained/maintained
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Wind › Crosswind › Effect on operation
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Wind › Gusts › Effect on operation

Dual student

  • Certificate: student
  • Flight time: 30 hours in all; 5 in this make and model; 29 in the last 90 days; 5 in the last 30 days; 3 as pilot in command
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

Flight instructor

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine sea; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 337 hours in all; 10 in this make and model; 63 in the last 90 days; 40 in the last 30 days; 265 as pilot in command; 53 on instruments
  • Last flight review: April 14, 2016
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 5,816 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, August 23, 2016
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,600 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Cont Motor O-200-A (piston); 3,632 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: N27 Towanda PA at 3:30 pm
  • Destination: FKL Franklin PA
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 30, 3,593 ft by 100 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 180° at 12 knots, gusting 16
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 81°F (27°C), dew point 61°F (16°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.20 inHg
  • Observation at 5:55 pm from KFKL, 1 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew2

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

3 documents, released by the NTSB on October 17, 2016. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.