The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB GAA15CA215 · Final report

Cessna 560XL accident near Spanish Fork, Utah, August 5, 2015

On August 5, 2015 at about 2:20 pm local time, a 2001 Cessna 560XL, registered N560JF, was substantially damaged in an accident during taxi (to runway) near Spanish Fork, Utah (Spanish Fork-Springville-Woodh airport). It was an executive or corporate flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 3 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The Captain's decision to taxi on a closed taxiway, which resulted in a collision with a parked construction vehicle. Contributing to the accident was a ground crew employee's decision to move barricades from the closed taxiway.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
August 5, 2015 · about 2:20 pm local time
Place
Spanish Fork, Utah · Spanish Fork-Springville-Woodh · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 3 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 560XL ENCORE, built 2001 · all 560XLs on the register
Registration
N560JF · registry record · serial 5605173
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Executive or corporate flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

During taxi to the runway, the Captain reported that he originally planned to back taxi on the runway, but he observed a gyroplane waiting to takeoff and decided to taxi on the closed taxiways to allow the other aircraft to depart. As the taxi progressed on the closed taxiway, the Captain reported that his First Officer stated, "Watch that left side!" When the Captain looked to his left, he observed the left wing of the airplane strike a construction vehicle that was parked next to the taxiway. After the collision, the Captain stopped the airplane and shutdown the engines on the taxiway. The Captain stated there were no mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation. The left wing sustained substantial damage. The Captain stated that there were no barricades present on the closed taxiways, and the construction vehicle was not marked or flagged. The Captain also reported that he checked the notices to airmen (NOTAMs) during preflight and was aware of the taxiway closures at the departure airport. During postaccident interviews, an employee of the fixed based operator (FBO) stated that he moved the barricades on the closed taxiways earlier in the morning so that another airplane could depart. The airport manager stated that the taxiways were published closed and he did not provide any instructions to move the barricades.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Ground collision during taxi (to runway) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
  • factor Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Unnecessary action › Ground crew
  • Aircraft › Aircraft structures › Wing structure › (general) › Damaged/degraded

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 4,820 hours in all; 740 in this make and model; 36 in the last 90 days; 12 in the last 30 days; 2,995 as pilot in command; 23 on instruments
  • Last flight review: September 19, 2014
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

Co-pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 2,361 hours in all; 576 in this make and model; 45 in the last 90 days; 25 in the last 30 days; 1,150 as pilot in command; 850 on instruments
  • Last flight review: September 18, 2014
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

Passenger

  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 4,022 hours
  • Last inspection: continuous airworthiness programme, July 11, 2015
  • Maximum gross weight: 20,000 lb
  • Seats: 10
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: Pratt & Whitney PW - 545 A (turbofan); 4,173 hours total
  • Engine 2: Pratt & Whitney PW-545-A (turbofan); 4,173 hours total
  • Operator: Snow Peak Ventures LLC

The flight

  • Departed from: U77 Spanish Fork UT at 2:15 pm
  • Destination: SGU St George UT
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • Runway 12, 5,700 ft by 100 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 120° at 5 knots
  • Visibility: 15 statute miles
  • Sky: scat at 12,000 ft
  • Temperature: 66°F (19°C), dew point 46°F (8°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.04 inHg
  • Observation at 1:55 pm from KPVU, 5 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew2
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

2 documents, released by the NTSB on September 29, 2015. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.