Piper PA-32R-300 accident near Rachel, Texas, September 9, 2004
On September 9, 2004 at about 11:14 am local time, a Piper PA-32R-300, registered N6209J, was destroyed in an accident near Rachel, Texas. It was flown under charter and air-taxi rules (Part 135). 1 person was killed. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The total failure of the vacuum pump that resulted in an inoperative attitude gyro and spatial disorientation and a subsequent loss of aircraft control by the pilot. Factors were; the prevailing instrument meteorological conditions, and the dark night light condition.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- September 9, 2004 · about 11:14 am local time
- Place
- Rachel, Texas · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 1 person was killed.
- Weather
- instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
- Aircraft
- Piper PA-32R-300 · all PA-32R-300s on the register
- Registration
- N6209J · no longer on the register · serial 32R-7680332
- Damage
- Destroyed
- Flight
- Flight · charter and air-taxi rules (Part 135)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
A single-engine airplane, operating in dark night instrument meteorological conditions as a Part 135 mail cargo flight, impacted terrain after an in-flight break up. Several minutes before the impact, the pilot reported to air traffic control that he had lost his vacuum pump. An on-site examination of the wreckage revealed that the vacuum pump the drive was separated from the engine and the flex coupling displayed a torsion-type separation with coupling wear consistent with engine operation after the separation. Disassembly of the model 211CC vacuum pump revealed the following. A number was assigned to each of the rotor segments and the corresponding vanes were marked and removed from their respective slots. Five of the six vanes were intact, and vane #4 was broken. Four pieces were reassembled to recreate approximately 80 percent of vane #4. Three of the four pieces were found in the mounting flange, and one piece was found in the back flange. The rotor segments were marked such that vane slot #4 is between segment 4 and segment 5. Upon examination of the walls of vane slot 4, a groove approximately .450 inches by .120 inches by .020 inches deep was found on both sides of the vane slot. These grooves corresponded in dimension and position to the portion of the vane that was missing. Three carbon pieces were found, which exhibited extensive wear, which, in two cases, were smooth and round like a "BB." The rear fracture surface of vane #4 exhibited a smooth, polished, spherical wear mark corresponding with the carbon pieces found. The pump housing had severe wear such that there were washboard marks around its entire circumference. At the bottom of the bore, a burr was found on the edge of one of the back flange discharge ports. Corresponding rotational marks were found on the pump's rotor. According to Parker Hannifin, the rule of thumb for vane wear versus service life is: .025-inches of wear for every 100 hours of operation. Using Parker's original new vane length of .845 inches, the estimated time of operation of the vanes of the accident pump was approximately 1,380 hours. According to Parker the vacuum pump had been overhauled. Parker's service letters require replacement of model 211CC vacuum pumps after 500 hours of operation or 6 years from the date of manufacture, which ever occurs first. Examination of the directional gyro revealed that the housing was intact and the gyro was free to move. No rotational marks were found on the gyro or inside the housing. The turn coordinator gyro was examined and no rotational scoring was found when removed from the housing. A small portion of the housing was fractured and missing. The attitude indicator gyro was free to move within its housing and the housing was intact. No rotational scoring was noted when the gyro was removed from the housing. The filament of the vacuum enunciator bulb # PL33[0] exhibited stretching.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
Pilot
- Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
- Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 2,290 hours in all; 195 in the last 90 days; 56 in the last 30 days; 2,180 as pilot in command; 144 on instruments
- Last flight review: October 9, 2003
- Medical certificate: Class 1 (valid medical--no waivers/lim.)
- Seat: frt
- Injury: fatal
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 8,411.4 hours
- Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, August 2, 2004; 89.4 hours since
- Maximum gross weight: 3,600 lb
- Seats: 2
- Landing gear: retractable
- Engine: Lycoming IO-540-K1G5D (piston); 0 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: SSF San Antonio TX at 10:10 am
- Destination: MFE Mc Allen TX
- Flight plan: IFR
Weather at the time
- Light: night, dark
- Wind: from 330° at 4 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: overcast at 4,200 ft; ovct at 4,200 ft
- Temperature: 72°F (22°C), dew point 64°F (18°C)
- Altimeter: 29.95 inHg
- Observation at 11:25 am from BKS, 8 miles away
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crew | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
