The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA24LA251 · Final report

Amateur-built JA30 SUPERSTOL accident near Tennille, Georgia, June 8, 2024

On June 8, 2024 at about 11:50 pm local time, a 2018 amateur-built JA30 SUPERSTOL, registered N719LN, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute near Tennille, Georgia. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The loss of elevator control during flight due to the elevator control rod and its hardware disconnecting from its installation area, which resulted in an uncontrolled descent into trees and terrain. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s inadequate inspection of the airplane and improperly performing the condition inspection without holding a repairman certificate.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
June 8, 2024 · about 11:50 pm local time
Place
Tennille, Georgia · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person had minor injuries.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Amateur-built JA30 SUPERSTOL NO SERIES, built 2018
Registration
N719LN · registry record · serial JA 472-11-15
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot reported that he departed his home airport to maneuver in the local area. The maneuvering was uneventful and after about 10 to 15 minutes he began navigating back to the airport. While in level flight, approaching the airport’s traffic pattern area, about 2,500 ft mean sea level, he observed that the airplane’s “nose starts drifting down” to about 45° pitch down. He moved the control stick and there was “nothing” for elevator control and he processed that “elevator control authority was lost” as it felt like the control stick had become disconnected. The roll/ aileron control authority continued to function. He reported that he reduced power, tightened his seatbelt, and the airplane’s pitch continued to decrease, but as airspeed increased, the airplane’s pitch attitude “increased somewhat” to about 30° pitch down. The airplane continued to descend towards terrain. Shortly before impact, he reported that he maneuvered to the right to avoid a house and subsequently impacted a tree and terrain. The fuselage and wings sustained substantial damage. Postaccident inspection of the airplane found that the connection point between the elevator push rod and the control stick mixer was missing all of its hardware, which normally would be secured with a locknut (the missing hardware was not recovered). Reference Figure 1 for a view of the accident airplane as found compared to an exemplar parts and hardware. Figure 1: View of the elevator connecting rod attachment areas, exemplar and accident airplane (Photo Courtesy of FAA & Just Aircraft) The pilot reported that he performed the most recent condition inspection of the airplane 2 months before the accident. He reported that the elevator system and its hardware were not removed during the most recent inspection. The pilot was unable to produce the maintenance records despite repeated requests, nor did he hold a repairman certificate. The pilot, who was the builder of the airplane, reported that it had accumulated 130 hours of total flight time.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Flight control sys malf/fail during enroute defining event
  2. Loss of control in flight during enroute

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
  • Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Misc hardware › Fasteners › Inadequate inspection
  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Flight control system › Elevator control system › Inadequate inspection

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 159 hours in all; 130 in this make and model
  • Last flight review: July 7, 2023
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: minor injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 130 hours
  • Last inspection: condition inspection, April 1, 2024; 3 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,320 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Rotax 912ULS SERIES (piston); 130 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: OKZ Sandersville GA at 11:30 pm
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 75°F (24°C), dew point 66°F (19°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.91 inHg

Weather report (METAR): METAR KOKZ 090055Z AUTO 00000KT 10SM CLR 24/19 A2991 RMK AO2 T02360190=

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Photographs from the investigation 4 pictures from the NTSB's docket, as the NTSB released them

The NTSB's photographs with the NTSB's captions, at screen size. Open a picture to see it full size or to report one that should not be shown.

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

5 documents, released by the NTSB on September 19, 2024. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.