The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA21LA352 · Final report

Amateur-built BUSH WACKER accident near Thomaston, Georgia, April 16, 2021

On April 16, 2021 at about 3:10 pm local time, a 1999 amateur-built BUSH WACKER, registered N797RT, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing (flare/touchdown) near Thomaston, Georgia (Thomaston-Upson County airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

A loss of directional control upon landing for reasons that could not be determined as a result of a delayed report. Contributing was the pilot’s decision to continue a flight with an unknown airworthiness issue.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
April 16, 2021 · about 3:10 pm local time
Place
Thomaston, Georgia · Thomaston-Upson County · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Amateur-built BUSH WACKER, built 1999
Registration
N797RT · registry record · serial 021150
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The student pilot had recently purchased the airplane and requested the airline transport pilot (ATP) assist him flying it back to his home airport. During an enroute stop, the ATP pilot reported that during the landing roll, the airplane became uncontrollable and veered off the left side of the runway, striking a runway sign, which resulted in substantial damage to the right horizontal stabilizer and elevator. The pilot reported that he believed there might have been rigging or tailwheel mechanical issues with the airplane. A visual examination of the brake system performed by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector did not reveal any damage, however, the brakes were not tested. The NTSB was not notified of the accident until five months after the occurrence which precluded further examination of the brake and tailwheel system. According to an FAA inspector who reviewed the maintenance records and interviewed people familiar with the airplane’s history, the airplane had been flown about 10 hours in the previous 10 years. The condition inspection, accomplished about 2 months before the accident by a mechanic, revealed the airplane was “squirrely and sensitive” on the controls, but he considered the airplane airworthy. About a month before the accident, the brakes had been rebuilt, and the airplane was returned to service. The ATP pilot, who had never flown this make and model before, reported that he confirmed the airworthiness of the airplane prior to departure, however, he also reported to the FAA inspector that the airplane was not acting right during two takeoff attempts, before the third successful takeoff attempt that initiated the accident sequence. The accident likely could have been prevented if the pilot chose to further investigate the anomaly he experienced on the ground, rather than continuing the flight.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control on ground during landing (flare/touchdown) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Landing gear system › Landing gear brakes system › Unknown/Not determined
  • Personnel issues › Experience/knowledge › Experience/qualifications › Recent experience w/ equipment › Unknown/Not determined
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Directional control › Unknown/Not determined
  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; single-engine sea; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Flight time: 8,300 hours in all; 1 in this make and model
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

Dual student

  • Certificate: student
  • Flight time: 20 hours in all
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 703 hours
  • Last inspection: condition inspection, February 6, 2021; 1 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,670 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-320-E2D (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: VDI Vidalia GA at 2:00 pm
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 12/3, 6,350 ft by 100 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 080° at 4 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 57°F (14°C), dew point 37°F (3°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.99 inHg
  • Observation at 11:15 am from OPN

Weather report (METAR): METAR KOPN 161515Z AUTO 08004KT 10SM CLR 14/03 A2999 RMK AO2=

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

4 documents, released by the NTSB on June 8, 2022. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.