The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA20LA270 · Final report

Piper PA31 accident near Sumter, South Carolina, August 1, 2020

On August 1, 2020 at about 2:00 pm local time, a 1975 Piper PA31, registered CGXKS, was substantially damaged in an accident during maneuvering (low-alt flying) near Sumter, South Carolina. It was an aerial observation flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s fuel mismanagement during flight, which resulted in a total loss of engine power from both engines due to fuel starvation.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
August 1, 2020 · about 2:00 pm local time
Place
Sumter, South Carolina · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people had minor injuries.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Piper PA31 325, built 1975 · all PA31s on the register
Registration
CGXKS · no longer on the register · serial 31-7512038
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Aerial observation flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

According to the pilot, he and the copilot were flying low-level mapping flights in the twin-engine airplane. Although the copilot was not multi-engine rated, he and the pilot regularly switched control of the airplane during the mapping flights. On the accident flight, the pilot was seated in the right seat; the copilot was seated in the left seat; and they were flying the airplane at an altitude of about 300 ft above ground level. According to the pilot, they flew for about 2 hours before he, who was the pilot flying at the time, switched fuel tanks from the inboard tanks to the outboard tanks. The pilot did not tell the copilot he had switched fuel tanks. About 1.5 hours later, while the copilot was the pilot flying, the left engine started to surge and lose power. The pilot began the steps of the emergency procedure for an engine failure in cruise flight starting with moving the fuel selectors to the inboard tanks. Power was not restored; the airplane immediately began losing altitude; and the pilot took over control of the airplane. The copilot stated that at the time the pilot took over control, he looked at the fuel tank quantity gauges, and they both displayed zero. The pilot reported that the airplane stalled just above the ground during the emergency landing in a field. The right wing struck first, and within a couple of seconds, the right outboard fuel tank exploded. The pilot and copilot egressed out the rear door. Examination of the wreckage revealed that neither engine exhibited evidence of power at impact. The left outboard fuel tank was found completely full of fuel, and the left inboard fuel tank was empty. Both right wing tanks were fire damaged, and the fuel quantity in the tanks at impact could not be determined. Further examination revealed that the fuel crossfeed valve was in the “crossfeed/open” position. No fuel was observed in the valve or attached fuel lines during disassembly. The left fuel selector valve was found in the “OFF” position, and no fuel was observed within the fuel line between the valve and gascolator. The right fuel selector valve was damaged by fire, and its position at impact could not be determined. No other anomalies were noted in the engines or airframe. According to the pilot, all fuel tanks were full before the flight. According to the pilot’s operating manual, the airplane likely consumed about 33.1 gallons of fuel per hour or a total of about 115 gallons of fuel during the 3.5-hour flight. Given that the inboard fuel cells held 56 gallons each (112 gallons total), that the left inboard tank was found empty, and that the copilot noticed that the fuel gauges were reading zero just before impact, it is likely that each engine was drawing fuel from its respective inboard tank throughout the flight until those tanks were empty. The left engine lost power first, and the right engine likely lost power just before impact. The postaccident positions of the crossfeed valve (on) and the left fuel selector (off) did not correspond to the pilot’s statements regarding his positioning of the fuel selector valves during the flight. The fuel panel was located between and behind the pilots’ seats and required the pilots to look down and back in order to see the panel when making changes to the panel; therefore, it is likely the pilot misconfigured the valves when he switched tanks 2 hours into the flight, when he switched tanks after the left engine lost power, or on both occasions. It is unlikely the copilot would have been able to see an incorrect switch selection on the fuel panel due to the location of the panel, and he would have been unlikely to look at the 2-hour point as the pilot did not verbalize that a change to the panel had been made.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Off-field or emergency landing during emergency descent
  2. Aerodynamic stall/spin during emergency descent
  3. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent
  4. Fuel related during maneuvering (low-alt flying) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of equip/system › Pilot
  • Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Fuel › Fluid management

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot, private
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 1,625.4 hours in all; 550 in this make and model; 138.8 in the last 90 days; 77.5 in the last 30 days; 1,181.5 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: June 20, 2020
  • Medical certificate: Class 1
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: minor injuries

Co-pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot, private
  • Ratings: single-engine land; single-engine sea
  • Medical certificate: Class 1
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: minor injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 12,038 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, July 23, 2020; 22.2 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 6,499 lb
  • Seats: 8
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: Lycoming TIO-540f2BDL (piston); 0 hours total
  • Engine 2: Lycoming TIO-540f2BDL (piston); 0 hours total
  • Fire on the ground

The flight

  • Departed from: MNI Manning SC at 10:30 am
  • Destination: MNI Manning SC
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 220° at 6 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 84°F (29°C), dew point 73°F (23°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.97 inHg
  • Observation at 1:56 pm from KSSC, 7 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew2

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

9 documents, released by the NTSB on September 21, 2022. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.