The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA17LA203 · Final report

Cessna 172 accident near Suffolk, New York, June 12, 2017

On June 12, 2017 at about 10:15 am local time, a 1973 Cessna 172, registered N13306, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (cruise) near Suffolk, New York. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

A loss of preload to the crankshaft gear attachment bolt due to improper installation, which resulted in the fatigue failure of the crankshaft gear alignment dowel and led to the rotation of the crankshaft gear and a subsequent total loss of engine power.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
June 12, 2017 · about 10:15 am local time
Place
Suffolk, New York · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 172 M, built 1973 · all 172s on the register
Registration
N13306 · no longer on the register · serial 17262654
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

According to the private pilot, while en route during a cross-country personal flight, he heard a "loud pop," followed by the engine losing all power. He declared an emergency, unsuccessfully attempted to restart the engine, and turned the airplane toward a golf course. During the landing, the airplane struck a tree, which resulted in substantial damage to the right wing. Postaccident examination of the engine revealed that the crankshaft gear alignment dowel, which sets the rotational alignment of the gear with respect to the crankshaft, had fractured; one half of the dowel was retained in the crankshaft and was contacting the gear, and the other half of the dowel was retained in the pilot flange hole. Examination of the fracture surface indicated that the dowel fractured in fatigue, initially in unidirectional bending that started on the side with the wear but transitioned to reverse bending fatigue before the final failure. Rub marks were observed on parts of the gear in contact with the crankshaft and along the interface between the gear and the lock plate. This evidence indicates that the bolt that fastened the crankshaft gear to the crankshaft was either not torqued to the proper value during assembly or that the bolt was torqued to the proper value but gradually lost preload due to an installation error. With insufficient preload, the gear would have placed unintended stresses on the alignment dowel, which would have resulted in wear and its eventual failure due to fatigue. Factors that could result in a loss of preload include improper installation of the lock plate or damage or debris trapped between the gear and the counterbore recess, which would prevent proper seating of the gear. An engine manufacturer's service bulletin (SB) described the proper procedure for evaluating the condition of the crankshaft and crankshaft gear and the proper procedure for attaching the crankshaft gear to the crankshaft. One step stated that after aligning the crankshaft gear with the crankshaft using the alignment dowel, the bolt should be tightened to 125 inch-lbs of torque, followed by several checks to ensure that the gear was properly seated. After those checks were made, the final step was to tighten the bolt to 204 inch-lbs of torque. Examination of the gear did not reveal any indications of deformation or debris that would have prevented proper seating of the gear against the face of the crankshaft counterbore recess. The locking tab was bent, but the bend was not aligned with the tab's plastic hinge. Presumably the bend was aligned with a flat face of the bolt head. It is likely that aligning the bolt with the flat face of the bolt head instead of with the tab's plastic hinge allowed the bolt to lose torque. It is also possible that, after applying the initial torque and checking whether the gear was properly seated, the final torque to 204 inch-lbs was not applied. In conclusion, the engine failed when the crankshaft gear alignment dowel failed, which allowed the gear to rotate independently of the crankshaft and shifted the timing of the engine's crankshaft to its camshaft, which resulted in a total loss of engine power. The alignment dowel failed due to unintended loads from the crankshaft gear, which resulted in the dowel wearing and eventually failing in fatigue. The unintended loads likely resulted from the improper installation of the crankshaft bolt and locking tab, which led to insufficient torque being applied to the bolt during installation or an eventual loss of torque during subsequent engine operation. A review of maintenance records revealed that the engine had been overhauled and that the engine failure occurred about 200 hours after the overhaul. The records did not specify compliance with the SB that provided the proper procedure for evaluating the condition of the crankshaft and crankshaft gear and the instructions for installing the crankshaft gear to the crankshaft.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of engine power (total) during enroute (cruise) defining event
  2. Attempted remediation/recovery during enroute (cruise)
  3. Off-field or emergency landing during landing
  4. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during landing (landing roll)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Maintenance › Installation › Maintenance personnel
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine (reciprocating) › Recip eng rear section › Failure
  • Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › Tree(s) › Contributed to outcome

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Medical certificate: Class 3
  • Seat: unk
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 4,746.2 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, June 5, 2017
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,299 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-320 SERIES (piston); 2,005 hours total
  • Operator: Ywp Air INC

The flight

  • Departed from: HWV Shirley NY
  • Destination: 23N Bayport NY
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 240° at 4 knots
  • Visibility: 8 statute miles
  • Sky: a few clouds at 25,000 ft
  • Temperature: 68°F (20°C), dew point 64°F (18°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.02 inHg
  • Observation at 9:56 am from ISP, 7 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

9 documents, released by the NTSB on April 1, 2019. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.