The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA17LA202 · Final report

Cessna 172P accident near Tamiami, Florida, June 10, 2017

On June 10, 2017 at about 2:50 pm local time, a 1983 Cessna 172P, registered N881AV, was substantially damaged in an accident during initial climb near Tamiami, Florida (Miami Executive airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

A partial loss of engine power during the initial climb due to carburetor icing.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
June 10, 2017 · about 2:50 pm local time
Place
Tamiami, Florida · Miami Executive · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 172P, built 1983 · all 172Ps on the register
Registration
N881AV · no longer on the register · serial 17276056
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

Following an uneventful preflight inspection of the airplane, the student pilot and the flight instructor taxied and then began their runup checks of the engine. The flight instructor stated that during the runup he noted a “normal” drop in engine rpm when they tested the carburetor heat, both with power on the engine and with the throttle pulled back to idle. The subsequent takeoff takeoff was normal, but at about 350 ft above the ground, the flight instructor heard a slight decrease in engine power; he asked the student pilot if he was guarding the throttle, and he responded that he was. The power then came back. Then, at about 400 ft above the ground, the engine lost power again. The flight instructor stated that this time it was significant, as it dropped to 1,900 rpm and was fluctuating. The flight instructor then took the controls of the airplane, after which the power dropped to 1,100 rpm and continued to fluctuate. There was no available runway remaining and the airplane was losing altitude, so the flight instructor landed the airplane in a grass field on the airport property. He stated that on touchdown, he had very poor braking capability (likely due to the wet grass). The airplane struck a tree with the left wing, then struck the airport fence and substantially damaged the airplane’s wings. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed an adequate supply of uncontaminated fuel. Test runs of the engine were performed, during which the engine ran without hesitation and displayed no evidence of preimpact failures or malfunctions that would have precluded normal operation. Review of a carburetor icing probability chart revealed that the atmospheric conditions at the time of the accident were conducive to the formation of carburetor ice. Given this information, it is likely that while operating the airplane on the ground prior to takeoff, a period during which the engine would typically be operating at low power, carburetor ice began forming, which continued until the engine began losing engine power during the initial climb.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Off-field or emergency landing during landing
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during landing (landing roll)
  3. Fuel related during initial climb defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Temp/humidity/pressure › Conducive to carburetor icing › Effect on equipment

Flight instructor

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 1,488 hours in all; 1,449 in this make and model; 67 in the last 90 days; 43 in the last 30 days; 1,440 as pilot in command; 1,252 on instruments
  • Last flight review: April 27, 2016
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

Dual student

  • Flight time: 95 hours in all; 95 in this make and model; 7 in the last 90 days; 3 in the last 30 days; 7 as pilot in command
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 12,828.1 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, April 19, 2016
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,299 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming 0-320-D2J (piston); 1,173 hours total
  • Operator: Aircraft Development Flight Airways

The flight

  • Departed from: TMB Tamiami FL at 2:20 pm
  • Destination: TMB Tamiami FL
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 09L, 5,003 ft by 150 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 160° at 7 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: a few clouds at 1,500 ft
  • Temperature: 86°F (30°C), dew point 79°F (26°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.05 inHg
  • Observation at 2:53 pm from KTMB

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew2

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

5 documents, released by the NTSB on May 26, 2021. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.