Cessna 188B accident near Woodrow, South Carolina, September 4, 2013
On September 4, 2013 at about 10:35 pm local time, a 1973 Cessna 188B, registered N59JK, was substantially damaged in an accident during maneuvering (low-alt flying) near Woodrow, South Carolina (Hopkins Air Field). It was an aerial application (crop spraying) flight under agricultural flying rules (Part 137). 1 person had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
A failure of the right rudder pedal arm due to corrosion as a result of inadequate maintenance and inspection of the rudder pedal assembly.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- September 4, 2013 · about 10:35 pm local time
- Place
- Woodrow, South Carolina · Hopkins Air Field · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 1 person had minor injuries.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Cessna 188B, built 1973 · all 188Bs on the register
- Registration
- N59JK · no longer on the register · serial 18801041
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Aerial application (crop spraying) flight · agricultural flying rules (Part 137)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
While spraying a cotton field, the pilot completed a pass and, at the end of the field, pulled up to turn to the right. During the climb, he applied right rudder, but the right rudder pedal assembly broke off, allowing the pedal full travel to the back of the hopper tank. The pilot was able to return to the airfield and make an uneventful landing, but during the landing roll, the airplane began to turn left, and the pilot had no way to correct since the right rudder, right brake, and right tailwheel steering were not operable. The airplane then exited the left side of the runway and entered a soybean field, causing the right main landing gear to collapse and the right wing to impact the ground and sustain substantial damage. Postaccident examination of the rudder pedal assembly revealed the right rudder pedal arm had separated from its mounting location on the right rudder bar. Both were constructed of steel tubing. The external surfaces of the right rudder pedal arm exhibited areas with disbonded topcoat paint and exposed steel with minor surface corrosion. Internally, the right rudder pedal arm exhibited heavy rust scaling over all surfaces and rust scale that had sloughed from the surfaces had collected at the base of the right rudder pedal arm, where it attached to the right rudder bar. Although measurements of the tube wall's thickness at the top of the rudder pedal arm appeared to be full thickness, with measurements of 0.054 inch, 0.053 inch, 0.056 inch, and 0.055 inch (measured at 90 degree intervals around the circumference), measurements of the tube wall's thickness at the point of the fracture were only 0.030 inch at the thickest point and 0.013 at the thinnest point. The airplane was equipped with a liquid dispersal system, including a hopper tank located immediately forward of the cockpit. Remnants of corrosion product had adhered to silicone plugs that were at the top of the rudder pedal arm tubing, indicating that the corrosion product was present before the application of the silicone sealant. The plugs had likely been inserted in an attempt to keep contaminants (chemicals from the hopper tank and water from cleaning) out of the rudder pedal arms. Review of the Service Manual and Illustrated Parts Catalog revealed that the manufacturer had published inspection criteria for the airplane based on operating usage and operating environment. The criteria provided mandatory inspection intervals for components and airplane structures. The manufacturer also offered a supplemental Corrosion Prevention and Control Program to help prevent or control corrosion in the airplane's primary structure so that it did not cause a risk to continued airworthiness as the airplane aged. A supplemental inspection document also included guidance regarding corrosion inspection and corrosion control of the rudder system. Review of the maintenance records revealed no record of the modifications and no record of an inspection of the rudder system per the supplemental inspection document.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Aircraft maintenance event during prior to flight
- Aircraft inspection event during prior to flight
- Flight control sys malf/fail during maneuvering (low-alt flying) defining event
- Loss of control on ground during landing (landing roll)
- Runway excursion during landing (landing roll)
- Dragged wing/rotor/float/other during landing (landing roll)
- Landing gear collapse during landing (landing roll)
- Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during landing (landing roll)
The NTSB's findings
- cause Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Flight control system › Rudder control system › Fatigue/wear/corrosion
- cause Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Flight control system › Rudder control system › Failure
- cause Aircraft › Aircraft handling/service › Maintenance/inspections › Scheduled maint checks › Not serviced/maintained
- cause Aircraft › Aircraft handling/service › Maintenance/inspections › Scheduled maint checks › Inadequate inspection
- cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Maintenance › Scheduled/routine maintenance › Maintenance personnel
- cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Inspection › (general) › Maintenance personnel
Pilot
- Certificate: commercial pilot
- Ratings: single-engine land
- Flight time: 2,249 hours in all; 1,392 in this make and model
- Last flight review: July 12, 2012
- Medical certificate: Class 2 (without waivers/limitations)
- Seat: sngl
- Injury: minor injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 5,393 hours
- Last inspection: annual inspection, April 7, 2013
- Maximum gross weight: 3,800 lb
- Seats: 1
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Cont Motor O-470-R (piston); 743 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: Lydia SC at 10:05 pm
- Destination: None Woodrow SC
- Flight plan: none
- Runway 29, 2,309 ft by 70 ft
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 330° at 4 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: broken clouds at 10,000 ft; a few clouds at 5,500 ft
- Temperature: 88°F (31°C), dew point 66°F (19°C)
- Altimeter: 30.01 inHg
- Observation at 10:58 pm from SSC, 8 miles away
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
