The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA13LA069 · Final report

Lawson J/Bowie R/Smith M CA-8 accident near Merritt Island, Florida, November 28, 2012

On November 28, 2012 at about 7:35 pm local time, a Lawson J/Bowie R/Smith M CA-8, registered N155JD, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach (VFR go-around) near Merritt Island, Florida (Merritt Island airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was seriously injured and 1 person had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's improper decision to continue a cross-country flight as a primary control (aileron) system anomaly progressively worsened. Contributing to the accident was an aileron control system anomaly, the reason for which could not be determined because the aileron control system could not be tested due to impact damage, and the pilot’s inability to compensate for crosswind conditions encountered during the approach due to the aileron problem.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
November 28, 2012 · about 7:35 pm local time
Place
Merritt Island, Florida · Merritt Island · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was seriously injured and 1 person had minor injuries.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Lawson J/Bowie R/Smith M CA-8
Registration
N155JD · registry record · serial 998205
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot was conducting a cross-country flight, and the first leg of the flight was uneventful. After the airplane was refueled, the pilot departed for his destination airport. About 200 miles from the destination airport, the airplane began experiencing a left rolling tendency, which required right aileron control inputs to counteract; the rolling progressively worsened as the flight continued. During that time, the pilot could have diverted to several other airports along his route of flight. While maneuvering in the traffic pattern at the destination airport, full right aileron control was required to maintain straight-and-level flight, and only a slight relaxing of right aileron control was needed to turn left. The pilot had difficulty compensating for a northwest crosswind and performed a go-around. During the second approach, the pilot lined up the airplane on the northern side of the runway approach course, and, subsequently, he attempted to perform another go-around. When the pilot applied engine power, the airplane began to roll slowly left despite right aileron and rudder control inputs. He decreased the engine power, but the airplane's left wing struck the ground, and the airplane flipped over. Examination of the airplane did not reveal any preimpact malfunctions that would have precluded normal operation; however, the condition of the wreckage, which included impact damage to the aileron control servo, precluded the ability to functionally check the flight control system, which was electrically actuated. Wind reported at an airport located about 8 miles southeast of the accident site was from 340 degrees at 16 knots about the time of the accident.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Flight control sys malf/fail during enroute (cruise)
  2. Loss of control in flight during approach (VFR go-around) defining event
  3. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
  • factor Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Flight control system › Aileron control system › Malfunction
  • factor Not determined › Not determined › (general) › (general) › Unknown/Not determined
  • factor Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Wind › Crosswind › Effect on operation

Pilot

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land; single-engine sea; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 5,569 hours in all; 102 in this make and model; 42 in the last 90 days; 9 in the last 30 days; 5,357 as pilot in command
  • Medical certificate: Class 2
  • Seat: frt
  • Injury: serious injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 923 hours
  • Last inspection: condition inspection, September 30, 2011
  • Maximum gross weight: 5,800 lb
  • Seats: 6
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Walter M601D (turboprop); 925 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: MAO Marion SC at 4:00 pm
  • Destination: COI Merritt Island FL
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 29, 3,601 ft by 75 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 340° at 16 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: scat at 1,900 ft
  • Temperature: 70°F (21°C), dew point 64°F (18°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.19 inHg
  • Observation at 7:37 pm from COF, 8 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.