The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA10CA200 · Final report

Cessna 172 accident near Sarasota, Florida, March 30, 2010

On March 30, 2010 at about 8:10 pm local time, a Cessna 172, registered N21394, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing (flare/touchdown) near Sarasota, Florida (Sarasota/Bradenton Internation airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The student pilot's inadequate recovery from a bounced landing.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
March 30, 2010 · about 8:10 pm local time
Place
Sarasota, Florida · Sarasota/Bradenton Internation · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 172 S · all 172s on the register
Registration
N21394 · registry record · serial 172S10449
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

According to the student pilot, he was on his first solo cross-country flight but decided to return to his departure airport as he was uncomfortable with the winds. On landing, the airplane bounced and the nose landing gear collapsed. The pilot reported that there were no mechanical problems with the airplane. A left-quartering headwind at 12 knots was present at the time of the accident.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Hard landing during landing (flare/touchdown) defining event
  2. Runway excursion during landing (landing roll)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Student pilot
  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Incorrect action performance › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › (general) › Not attained/maintained

Pilot

  • Certificate: student
  • Flight time: 47 hours in all; 47 in this make and model
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 1,620 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, March 4, 2010
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,558 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming IO-360 (piston); 0 hours total
  • Operator: Cirrus Aviation

The flight

  • Departed from: SRQ Sarasota FL
  • Destination: SRQ Sarasota FL
  • Flight plan: not recorded
  • Runway 32, 9,500 ft by 150 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 290° at 12 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 68°F (20°C), dew point 45°F (7°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.02 inHg
  • Observation at 7:53 pm from SRQ

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Other NTSB records under N21394 the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

2001-04-03LAX01LA138 · accident near Tucson, AZ · substantial damage · no injuries

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.