The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB DEN08LA109 · Final report

Flight Design GMBH CTSW accident near Von Ormy, Texas, June 21, 2008

On June 21, 2008 at about 9:13 pm local time, a Flight Design GMBH CTSW, registered N460CT, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (cruise) near Von Ormy, Texas. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's inadequate in-flight decision by failing to refuel while en route, resulting in fuel exhaustion. Contributing to the accident were a proper touchdown point was not possible and the inadequate display of the fuel quantity indicator.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
June 21, 2008 · about 9:13 pm local time
Place
Von Ormy, Texas · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Flight Design GMBH CTSW · all CTSWs on the register
Registration
N460CT · registry record · serial 05-07-06
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

As the pilot was being radar vectored through controlled airspace, the engine began to sputter and then it "stopped." The pilot was unable to restart the engine, so he moved the propeller to the horizontal position "to protect the engine during touchdown." He selected a "good field" in level pastureland for the forced landing. After turning onto the base leg, he noticed a number of horses grazing at the beginning of the field and he turned on final approach sooner than intended. This moved his touchdown point further downfield than he wanted. Indicated airspeed was 50 mph in the flare. He lowered the flaps to 40 degrees. As soon as he cleared the horses, he retracted the flaps to "increase the friction of the brakes on the grassy pasture surface. This made the pasture a little short" and the airplane overran the end and struck a wire fence, collapsing the nose gear and buckling the composite structure. The pilot admitted that the engine lost power due to fuel exhaustion "which could have been avoided by obtaining fuel at the last stop." He said the airplane was not equipped with in-flight readable fuel indicators, only a dipstick gauge, and this makes it "tricky to utilize the full 34 gallon capacity." He concluded that "an accurate fuel gauge and experience with timing and fuel usage at a certain RPM would have solved this fuel management problem." He recommended that "the fuel indicator tubes in the wing roots be changed at every annual inspection."

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Fuel exhaustion during enroute (cruise) defining event
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during landing (landing roll)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Lack of action › Pilot
  • factor Environmental issues › Task environment › Physical workspace › Controls and displays › Contributed to outcome
  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › Animal(s)/bird(s) › Not specified
  • Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › Fence/fence post › Not specified
  • factor Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Descent/approach/glide path › Not attained/maintained

Pilot

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 5,957 hours in all; 9 in the last 90 days; 7 in the last 30 days; 3,415 on instruments
  • Last flight review: February 1, 2008
  • Medical certificate: Sport Pilot (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 322 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, February 1, 2008; 33 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,320 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Rotax 912ULS (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: SGR Houston TX at 7:30 pm
  • Destination: T89 Castorville TX
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: at 0 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: scat at 25,000 ft
  • Temperature: 73°F (23°C), dew point 64°F (18°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.10 inHg
  • Observation at 9:15 pm from SAT

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Other NTSB records under N460CT the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

2012-07-30CEN12CA499 · accident near Hutchinson, KS · substantial damage · no injuries
2006-05-30NYC06CA135 · accident near Leesburg, VA · substantial damage · minor injuries

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.