The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB DCA97MA049 · Final report

Airbus Industrie A300B4-605R accident near West Palm Beach, Florida, May 12, 1997

On May 12, 1997 at about 7:29 pm local time, a Airbus Industrie A300B4-605R, registered N90070, suffered minor damage in an accident near West Palm Beach, Florida. It was a flight of an unrecorded kind under scheduled airline rules (Part 121). 1 person was seriously injured and 1 person had minor injuries; 163 others were unhurt. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The flightcrew's failure to maintain adequate airspeed during leveloff which led to an inadvertent stall, and their subsequent failure to use proper stall recovery techniques. A factor contributing to the accident was the flightcrew's failure to properly use the autothrottle.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
May 12, 1997 · about 7:29 pm local time
Place
West Palm Beach, Florida · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was seriously injured and 1 person had minor injuries; 163 others were unhurt.
Weather
instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
Aircraft
Airbus Industrie A300B4-605R A300B4-605 · all A300B4-605Rs on the register
Registration
N90070 · no longer on the register · serial 513
Damage
Minor damage
Flight
Flight of an unrecorded kind · scheduled airline rules (Part 121)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The flight was assigned an airspeed of 230 knots and cleared to descend from FL240 to 16,000 feet in preparation for landing at Miami. The FDR indicated that while the autopilot was engaged in the descent, the power levers moved from the mechanical autothrottle limit of 44 degrees to the manual limit of 37 degrees. As the aircraft leveled at 16,000 feet the airspeed decreased. The F/O began a right turn to enter a holding pattern and added some power, which stabilized the airspeed at 178 knots. However, the right bank and the resultant angle of attack (AOA) continued to increase, despite left aileron input by the autopilot. As the autopilot reached the maximum input of 20 degrees, bank angle increased past 50 degrees, and the AOA increased rapidly from 7 degrees to 12 degrees. At this point the stick shaker activated, the autopilot independently disconnected, the power was increased, and full left rudder was used to arrest the roll. The bank angle reached 56 degrees, and the AOA reached 13.7 degrees at 177 knots. The aircraft then pitched down, and entered a series of pitch, yaw, and roll maneuvers as the flight controls went through a period of oscillations for about 34 seconds. The maneuvers finally dampened and the crew recovered at approximately 13,000 feet. One passenger was seriously injured and one flight attendant received minor injuries during the upset. According to wind tunnel and flight test data the A300 engineering simulator should adequately represent the aircraft up to 9 degrees AOA. Unlike the accident aircraft; however, the simulator recovered to wings level promptly when the lateral control inputs recorded by the FDR were used. The roll disagreement between the simulator and accident aircraft began at 7 degrees AOA, and it appears that some effect not modeled in the simulator produced the roll discrepancy. Just prior to the upset the accident aircraft entered a cloud deck. The winds were approximately 240 degrees, 35 knots, and the ambient air temperature was approximately minus 4 degrees C. An atmospheric disturbance or asymmetric ice contamination were two possible explanations considered, but unproven.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, flight instructor, flight engineer
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 12,000 hours in all; 500 in this make and model; 7,000 as pilot in command; 1,350 on instruments
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left

Co-pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot, flight engineer, private
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: inspection type not recorded
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: (type not recorded); 0 hours total
  • Operator: American Airlines

The flight

  • Departed from: BOS Boston MA at 3:56 pm
  • Destination: MIA Miami FL
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 200° at 4 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: broken clouds at 2,500 ft; not recorded
  • Temperature: 73°F (23°C), dew point 72°F (22°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.00 inHg
  • Observation at 6:43 pm from PBI

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Crew18
Passengers1155

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Other NTSB records under N90070 the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

1997-12-15ATL98IA024 · incident near Montego Bay · minor damage · no injuries

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.